User talk:Gscshoyru

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia


Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello Gscshoyru and welcome to Wikipedia! Hope you like it here, and stick around.

Here are some tips to help you get started:

AngelOfSadness talk has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

[edit] Thanks!

My RFA
Thanks for participating in my request for adminship, which ended with 56 supports, one oppose, and one neutral. I hope to accomplish beyond what is expected of me and work to help those that lent me their trust. east.718 at 02:21, 11/4/2007

[edit] Kindness

The Random Acts of Kindness Barnstar
For all the help you've given me, I feel you deserve this User:David A (talk)

[edit] Chemical Sensitivity redirect

Hi, I was thinking of changing chemical sensitivity so that it redirects to multiple chemical sensitivity instead of to food intolerance. However, I noticed that you reverted the last attempt to do that. I submit two pieces of evidence that "chemical sensitivity" may be in fact be more related to multiple chemical sensitivity than to food intolerance: 1) The Chemical Sensitivity Foundation exists to educate people about multiple chemical sensitivity, 2) Chemical Sensitivity By William J. Rea seems to be referring to multiple chemical sensitivity (see his defintion of "chemical sensitivity" on page 7).

I can think of three ways to proceed: 1) I could turn the chemical sensitivity page into a disambiguation page so that it can lead to both multiple chemical sensitivity and to food intolerance. 2) I could have the chemical sensitivity page redirect only to multiple chemical sensitivity. 3) I could start a discussion about this in the talk page for chemical sensitivity (but who's going to think to look for it if it's in a redirected page?)

Please respond below so we can keep the thread together. Thanks, Riick (talk) 20:43, 13 April 2008 (UTC)

It was one of several POVed edits of a specific used I was reverting... I don't know much about the subject myself. It was during vandal-fighting that it was reverted. You bring up some valid points, though, so I think number 1 is probably the best way to go. If you get reverted, don't revert back, but discuss -- see WP:BRD.
I'm not currently involved all that much in wikipedia anymore... schoolwork has sort of worn away the habit. So if a discussion does get started, don't expect to hear much from me -- I'm not really around anymore. But it sounds to me like what you propose for number 1 should not be opposed anyways; it's a valid proposal. Go ahead and do it. Gscshoyru (talk) 22:04, 13 April 2008 (UTC)
Thank you for your helpful advice; I have gone ahead and changed chemical sensitivity into a disambiguation page. Good luck with your studies! Riick (talk) 19:56, 14 April 2008 (UTC)

[edit] request for advice

I am a new wikipedia user, and I was hoping you could give me some advice for customizing my userpage and also for editing.Maolain (talk) 01:47, 9 May 2008 (UTC)