Talk:Gryposaurus

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Gryposaurus has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
June 18, 2007 Good article nominee Listed

	This article, image or category is supported by WikiProject Dinosaurs, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of dinosaurs and dinosaur-related topics. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page for more information.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

[edit] Successful good article nomination

I am glad to say that this article which was nominated for good article status has succeeded. This is how the article, as of June 18, 2007, compares against the six good article criteria:

1. Well written?: On balance this is well written. Occasionally the language is perhaps overly dense, almost as if it was copied from an academic journal by someone who didn't know exactly how to rephrase for a general audience.

2. Factually accurate?: This article is exceptionally well-sourced. Bravo!

3. Broad in coverage?: An area for improvement is certainly the paleobiology section, if more is known. I'm aware that sometimes many aspects of prehistoric creatures are simply unknown or unstudied. There's relatively little in this article about what the life of a gryposaurus would have been like. This article would probably not reach FA status without a bigger paleobiology section.

4. Neutral point of view?: I sense no bias

5. Article stability? I sense no instability

6. Images?: More images would be great if they can be found, but a lack of images (or in this case, one image) is not a reason to deny good article status.

If you feel that this review is in error, feel free to take it to a GA review. Thank you to all of the editors who worked hard to bring it to this status. — JayHenry 03:14, 18 June 2007 (UTC)