User talk:Grunge226
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
The article Scott Sepkowicz has been speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This was done because the article seemed to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it did not indicate how or why the subject is notable, that is, why an article about that subject should be included in Wikipedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert notability may be deleted at any time. If you can indicate why the subject is really notable, you are free to re-create the article, making sure to cite any verifiable sources.
Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, and for specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for musicians, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. NawlinWiki 02:42, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Same for Siladelphia Nicers. Please read WP:NFT. NawlinWiki 02:43, 19 October 2007 (UTC)
Attacks in the article Paige bauder
Please do not make personal attacks as you did at Paige bauder. Wikipedia has a strict policy against personal attacks. Attack pages and images are not tolerated by Wikipedia and are speedily deleted. Users who continue to create or repost such pages and images, especially those in violation of our Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons policy, will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Thank you. VivioFateFan (Talk, Sandbox) 08:23, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] AfD nomination of Siladelphia Nicers
An article that you have been involved in editing, Siladelphia Nicers, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siladelphia Nicers. Thank you. AecisBrievenbus 00:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Siladelphia Nicers
A tag has been placed on Siladelphia Nicers, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to have no meaningful content or history, and the text is unsalvageably incoherent. If the page you created was a test, please use the sandbox for any other experiments you would like to do. Feel free to leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions about this.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Redfarmer (talk) 00:27, 12 January 2008 (UTC)
