Talk:Grundig

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Germany Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Germany, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles related to Germany on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.)
Additional information: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no

Since 2004(?) one is able to buy Grundig-equipment again. I do not know what company is supplying the parts.

Alba (electronics) and Beko are now building the kit, they bought all remaining assets and brand names of the company between them, and seem to be running it as one. --Kiand 13:38, 18 August 2005 (UTC)

Contents 1 "was" 2 Fair use rationale for Image:Grundigsw.jpg 3 Also Hungarian 4 Press release

[edit] "was"

I really, really don't like the "was" in the first paragraph, when we are dealing with an operative company. True, its now "Grundig Intermedia GmbH" and not "Grundig AG", but theres no way theres going to be enough reason for some time to come to seperate the articles. Moving the article to Grundig and treating the company as one sucessive entity (with the history explained, obviously), would be a way to not refer to what is still an existing company in past tense. --Kiand 21:33, 15 September 2005 (UTC)

I agree. This article has definitely evolved beyond the scope implied by Grundig AG. – Ringbang 01:37, 5 October 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Grundigsw.jpg

Image:Grundigsw.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.

Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.

If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 07:42, 5 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Also Hungarian

May i mention that Grundig is also partly an Hungarian company, due to most of its products being manufactured there. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 80.192.246.56 (talk) 15:25, 21 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Press release

The last few paragraphs of this article seem to copied and pasted from a press release. They don't seem to fit the article in terms of tone, and the amount of space given to them relative to the length of the article seems excessive. Do others agree? --Fun with aluminum (talk) 06:18, 18 May 2008 (UTC)