User talk:Grstain

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

 Please note: As of August 13, 2007, user Grstain has decided to take an extended leave of absence. Feel free to leave a message on his talk page. He may, or may not, get back to you at some point. Thank you.

Contents

[edit] lots of edits, not an admin

Hi - I made a list of users who've been around long enough to have made lots of edits but aren't admins. If you're at all interested in becoming an admin, can you please add an '*' immediately before your name in this list? I've suggested folks nominating someone might want to puruse this list, although there is certainly no guarantee anyone will ever look at it. Thanks. -- Rick Block (talk) 00:35, Jun 16, 2005 (UTC)

I saw you were the only editor, with over 20000 edits, whose name is in bold, indicating a willingness to be nominated for adminstrator, whose entry indicates they have not been nominated. Have you, in fact, not been nominated, even though your name appears to have been in bold for over two years? Are you still interested? Geo Swan 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I just moved my entry into the 20,000 edit band. I considered putting my name in bold -- then I read the discussions of some of those who had previously been nominated, and chose not to.
Cheers! Geo Swan 16:28, 8 November 2007 (UTC)
I agree. —Grstain | Talk 18:10, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] National Trust

Re. your entry on Sydney Harb. Nat. Pk, what did you mean by "dab national trust"? Can't work it out.

Sardaka 11:03, 20 August 2007 (UTC)

I replaced the reference to National Trust (which leads to National Trusts worldwide) by a link to National Trust of Australia —Grstain | Talk 18:11, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Template:Blyton bibliography

A template you created, Template:Blyton bibliography, has been marked for deletion as a deprecated and orphaned template. If, after 14 days, there has been no objection, the template will be deleted. If you wish to object to its deletion, please list your objection here and feel free to remove the {{deprecated}} tag from the template. If you feel the deletion is appropriate, no further action is necessary. Thanks for your attention. --MZMcBride 04:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Fine. —Grstain | Talk 18:12, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Four Great SF Novels

A {{prod}} template has been added to the article Four Great SF Novels, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you endorse deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please tag it with {{db-author}}. BPMullins | Talk 18:31, 10 October 2007 (UTC)

Fine. I wonder if the articles on the four novels were updated to state that they were reprinted in Four Great SF Novels. —Grstain | Talk 18:13, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] FAR National parks of England and Wales

National parks of England and Wales has been nominated for a featured article review. Articles are typically reviewed for two weeks. Please leave your comments and help us to return the article to featured quality. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, articles are moved onto the Featured Article Removal Candidates list for a further period, where editors may declare "Keep" or "Remove" the article from featured status. The instructions for the review process are here. Reviewers' concerns are here. — Rod talk 20:30, 9 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] International Kitchen Garden Day

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article International Kitchen Garden Day, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of International Kitchen Garden Day. Mdsummermsw (talk) 19:41, 30 January 2008 (UTC)

As you wish. —Grstain | Talk 16:34, 5 February 2008 (UTC)