Talk:Growth-share matrix
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| B | rated as B-Class on the assessment scale |
| High | rated as high-importance on the assessment scale |
[edit] Merging of B.C.G. analysis
- yes - merge and redirect!
- yes - shure, & redirect, at full speed :-)
- seems like a sensible idea
- Agree, keep Growth-Share matrix
- They are one and the same, why keep two separate topics for the same thing.
- I agree, the subjects are the same, though this is much more populist and as such misleading, but putting it in context will help Futureobservatory
- I agree - It's just another name for the same thing Yotwen 07:23, 16 September 2006 (UTC)
- So, can't someone just delete one of them and re-direct to the other?
- Indeed merge them because this is going on to long
Done it. Yotwen 15:58, 10 October 2006 (UTC)
Should the cash cow link in the references be Cash Cow? Same goes with some of the other uncapitalised links. /pedantic VoltageX 02:36, 25 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Diagram
Shouldnt the diagram by convention have the lowest values for both the X and Y axis at the bottom left corner, so that the stars would be on the top right not top left? --Unsigned
That is how most matrices are laid out, but for one reason or another, when the growth-share matrix was created it was done with the higher x value on the the left. This is the standard format of the growth-share matrix --Crocodile Punter 07:21, 1 July 2007 (UTC)
