User talk:Grim Reaper66

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Welcome

Hello, Grim Reaper66, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Newcomers help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, you can sign your name on Talk and vote pages using three tildes, like this: ~~~. Four tildes (~~~~) produces your name and the current date. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Kukini 15:59, 27 March 2006 (UTC)


A tag has been placed on Army of Freshmen, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done because the article is a repost of either already posted material, or of material that was previously deleted in a deletion debate, such as articles for deletion. If you can indicate how Army of Freshmen is different from all other articles, or if you can indicate why this article should not be deleted, I advise you to place the template {{hangon}} underneath the other template on the article, and also put a note on Talk:Army of Freshmen saying why this article should stay. An admin should check for such edits before deleting the article. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Please read our criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item 4 under General criteria. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself. We welcome your help in trying to improve Wikipedia, and we ask you to follow these instructions. RJASE1 20:57, 9 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: Army Of Freshmen Page

The page was speedily deleted because it was a repost of an article that had been deleted as a result of an AfD discussion (the original discussion can be found here). To request a reconsideration for article inclusion, you should request a deletion review. The primary justification for the original deletion seems to have been that the band did not meet notability criteria in WP:MUSIC, so I would read that section and justify notability based on one or more of those criteria. Best of luck, and hit me with any questions you may have... RJASE1 21:22, 10 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Recent edits to Trivium page

If you have citation for the rising please relist and give the citation. However, I can't find any citation. Therefore should not be listed. Moreover, Rain was never released as a single... it just had a video recorded as a promotional thing, I read it somewhere reliable once! I am not saying this is vandalism, because I am sure there was not any intent to vandalise, but please make sure there is citation for things you list. Asics talk 18:00, 18 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding edits to Trivium (band)

Thank you for contributing to Wikipedia, Grim Reaper66! However, your edit here was reverted by an automated bot that attempts to remove spam from Wikipedia. If you were trying to insert a good link, please accept my creator's apologies, but note that the link you added, matching rule blog\.myspace\.com/, is on my list of links to remove and probably shouldn't be included in Wikipedia. Please read Wikipedia's external links policy for more information. If the link was to an image, please read Wikipedia's image tutorial on how to use a more appropriate method to insert the image into an article. If your link was intended to promote a site you own, are affiliated with, or will make money from inclusion in Wikipedia, please note that inserting spam into Wikipedia is against policy. For more information about me, see my FAQ page. Thanks! Shadowbot 15:38, 17 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding an edit to Slipknot (band)

You removed brackets from a quote in the Slipknot article. I assume you did this because you thought they were a typo or vandalism. They were neither. The brackets represent where a quote was a reworded so that it may be better understood by a reader. --Wildnox(talk) 17:41, 12 June 2007 (UTC)