User:Grimjaw

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Fed up This user is fed up with wiki lawyering and other editor bullying tactics he found here at Wikipedia

during my stay here at wiki i've been told that: saying "a cat is an animal" would require a citation; that suggesting a fictional military who's commanding officer refers to himself as a "hitler follower", was based on nazi germany was original research (bearing in mind that the guy arguing with me ADMITED HIMSELF he saw an interview with the series creator saying the military in question WAS based on nazi germany); and my personal favorite...a guy who by his own admition had never played the videogame in question argued continously with me and others on the content of said videogame since it didn't have a source (despite repeated explanations that the gameplay itself is the source).

naturally when met with the idea that a policy that says to LIMIT use means there must be NO use, i was less than pleased. particularly when the other person refuses any attempt to discuss it, claiming any changes will be reverted. clearly that is inciting an edit war and yet the admins crack down on ME...for what else but inciting an edit war even tho the one trying to talk it out and comprimise was ME. 3 admins were contacted by multiple parties in this dispute on both sides and no dispute resolution was attempted on their part at all. they proceeded to selectively enforce blocking rules, namely blocking me for 3rr and letting the other party literally doing exactly what i did on the nfc clause...ignoring his blatant inciting of an edit war and the block he SHOULD have gotten for that (or at least a warning which never happened).

its not hard to see why i'm most likely done with wiki given its silent encouragement of bully tactics and self appointed non-content-contributing policy SS.

and since its against the rules and i now totally don't care i'm going to say what i wanted to say for awhile now. and for future clarification admins THIS is what a personal attack is, not calling a sockpuppet a sockpuppet.

hammersoft: i'd call him a faggot but he probably likes women he's just never had physical contact with one.

betacommand: a cumstain on society's panties, he will never contribute anything of value to anyone or anything...much like hammersoft his inability to get laid will eventually put some chlorine in the gene pool for us.

admins: completely worthless in nearly every respect...they are good for selective policy enforcement tho, and what a big help that is. oh and despite the fact its NOT against the rules using curse words and stating facts make any admin even more worthless.

beware fellow wikipedians, if ur telencephalon has corrugations you will most likely encounter a wikilaywer who will inexplicably be allowed to destroy whatever article u've invested time and effort into...they prefer useless idiots here instead of contributing members.

thank u and good night,

--Grimjaw (talk) 07:52, 6 January 2008 (UTC)