Talk:Griffith Review

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Flag
Portal
 Griffith Review is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
Start This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale.
Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale.
Assessment comments


We are posting a first draft to include Griffith REVIEW (a major Australian journal) on the Wikipedia. We will review the Wikipedia guidelines and invite material from other objective parties. We respect Wikipedia's integrity and we'll endevour to post an entry that meets the objectivity requirements. We are a small organisation and we respectfully request a period of 6 weeks to submit our revisions. Best Wishes, Griffith REVIEW Griffithreview 04:38, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

Two issues. First, per our username policy, group accounts created to promote an organization or company are prohibited, and may lead to an account being blocked from editing. Second, many here strongly frown upon creating or editing an article about a topic to which you have any relations or ties. The reason for this is that Wikipedia articles must be written from a neutral point of view, and be free from any personal or corporate bias. I've left a note explaining this in more detail on your talk page. Best, --Bfigura (talk) 04:54, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I've removed some of the more promotional sounding language. I couldn't find any reliable sources to establish notability. Can anyone else turn some up? Cheers, --Bfigura (talk) 05:24, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

I found a book review of Griffith Review in The Age from the weekend, I added it as a reference, I'm new to Wikipedia so I'm not sure if I've referenced it correctly. I'm used to university guidelines and Hardvard referencing systems. It seems to be a really good quality journal hopefully we can find some more references for it. I'm going to try looking online for reviews. Lizzie Kate 9 March 2008 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Lizziekate86 (talk • contribs) 05:13, 9 April 2008 (UTC)

Thank you :) I recoded the reference you added so that it would display properly (which does have the unfortunate side effect of making the source code less human readable). Basically, the cite template goes inside of the ref tags, then you use <references/> to generate the bibliography automatically. Cheers, --Bfigura (talk) 05:18, 9 April 2008 (UTC)