User talk:Greenguy1090

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Gibberish

About the Gibberish article, I was trying to edit the vandalism, but you already had, and I clicked the wrong link. My mistake, sorry. (ps: I am still new at this) Swammeyjoe 00:31, 3 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Vandalism

I think you've slipped up. :P No worries, though, I'll fix it. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 03:53, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

Haha, don't worry! It was all in good faith, after all. And keep up the good work reverting vandalism! Impressive for a user who joined today (I'm assuming that you were previously an IP editor or such?) Also, good choice using Lupin's tools! I find Filter Recent Changes to be a godsend when it comes to fighting vandals.

Oh, and since nobody has done so yet...

Welcome!
Hello Greenguy1090! Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. If you decide that you need help, ask me on my talk page, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Please remember to sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. Below are some recommended guidelines to facilitate your involvement. And remember, no question is "stupid"; if you have anything, absolutely anything that you'd like to know, feel free to drop on by and leave me a message! :D Happy Editing!

Getting Started
Getting your info out there
Getting more Wikipedia rules
Getting Help
Getting along
Getting technical

Catch ya around! :) Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:04, 1 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks

Thanks for catching the vandalism on my talk page. DavidJ710| talk 22:52, 4 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Re: your user page

No problem. I reported the vandal to WP:AIV so he can't disrupt anymore. Cheers, Master of Puppets Care to share? 05:54, 5 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] RE: Executive Officer vandalism

I should have done an undo initially since the vandalism I noticed also deleted half the article's text. What I was trying to do was to undo the history twice to get back to the good copy when you undid my first undo :-) Perhaps you could do this since you're registered, I'm not, and I don't knwo wikipedia etiquette... Anonymous J 5 December 2007 —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.181.32.200 (talk) 00:45, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

I moved the above comment to the bottom of the page in the name of keeping the chronological order. Sorry, I don't normally mess with other users' talk pages. Cheers. Master of Puppets Care to share? 00:49, 6 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Green Bay Packers WikiProject!

Lambeau Field Hello fellow Wikipedian! I just wanted to let you know that WikiProject Green Bay Packers is looking for participants who are interested in improving the quality of the articles on America's favorite small-town team, the Green Bay Packers! If you want to help, you can your name to our list of participants, check out our to-do list, and most importantly, improve the articles!


Gonzo fan2007 talkcontribs 01:04, 11 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Quote

A) I'll change the quote, B) I am an admin. C) Using Twinkle for everything isn't always the best policy. :) David Fuchs (talk) 02:26, 20 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Thanks!

Thanks very much for the GA review and pass on Mike Gravel. I appreciate your time on it! Wasted Time R (talk) 19:20, 12 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Your VandalProof Application

Thank you for your interest in VandalProof, Greenguy1090. As you may know, VP is a very powerful program, and in fact the just released 1.3 version has even more power. Because of this we must uphold strict protocols before approving a new applicant. Regretfully, I have chosen to decline your application at this time. Please note it is nothing personal by any means, and we certainly welcome you to apply again soon. Thank again for your interest in VandalProof. βcommand 05:09, 14 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] OpenMarket Inc.

Hey, I removed the prod on OpenMarket Inc. because the original editor has changed the article so it isn't about Qualcomm. If you still think what's there's now should be deleted, go ahead and retag it with a different reason. It does look a little spammy, to me, and definitely a coi violation. Corvus cornixtalk 00:46, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

I agree with your assessment and was about to remove the prod myself, but you beat me to it. At first glance it looks relatively NPOV, but claims should be referenced as it is clear from the username that there is a COI.--Greenguy1090 (talk) 00:48, 17 January 2008 (UTC)

[edit] UU work group

Welcome to the Unitarian Universalism work group, Greenguy1090! We're glad to have you! Aleta Sing 23:26, 21 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject Green Bay Packers Newsletter

- Newsletter Bot Talk 21:22, 2 April 2008 (UTC) This newsletter was delivered by Newsletterbot