User talk:Greatestrowerever

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Contents

[edit] Addict Clothing

Hello Greatestrowerever. I have been very unsuccessful at getting my article Addict_Clothing on to Wiki - the main reason why this hasn't worked is because it seems to be reported advertising, which with a very critical eye I can see it is; the reason I want it on there is because they have inspired me in my life, with their clothing and their music.

I was also told they aren't well known enough, but they are a well known brand and are stocked in most streetwear shops I've seen, they also supply Microsoft their clothing, and have very collectable, exclusive items like the Star Wars stuff which they have worked exclusively with George Lucas and have their other stuff done by Syd Mead, the dude who designed Tron and Blade Runner.

I was wondering what I should do to get my article to be non-biased!!

Thanks. Misch.wgreen —Preceding unsigned comment added by Mischa.wgreen (talk • contribs) 12:23, 20 February 2008 (UTC)

Probable COI, see here. Just FYI. Delicious carbuncle (talk) 17:15, 12 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Daniel Garcia

FYI, Daniel Garcia (magician) already went through a successful AfD, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Daniel Garcia (magician). I would just put a {{db-repost}} tag on the article, and an admin can delete the new version on sight. --Elonka 21:38, 24 March 2007 (UTC)

Done, thanks for info --Greatestrowerever 21:42, 24 March 2007 (UTC)


[edit] Styliztik

Why was the article deleted? All of the information about that person is useful and relevant. ---- User talk:Rafer11alston

un-encyclopedic, unreferenced, and non-notable--Greatestrowerever 23:52, 30 March 2007 (UTC)

[edit] JP Money

Hello Greatestrowerever. I would like to contest this tag because JP Money does exist and is a notable figure in the Columbia and Frogtown area. If you would like more info to validate this claim please respond and I will provide the necessary information to prevent this page from being deleted. Also, if you would like to you may search "Frogtown" and see that this is an actual place and JP Money is the interim Mayor. Thank you in advance for your efforts! 206.196.253.3(talk) 2 April 2007

[edit] Thansk! And help to wikiarc

Thanks for your welcome message.

Could you help me please? Someone has deleted the entire wikiarc page again. Fourth time now, I believe. Also, even my comments on the wikiarc discussion page have been deleted. No trace. Is that not bad behavior here? --Rasmus Paludan 20:57, 2 April 2007 (UTC)

it keeps getting deleted because it is a neologism with no verifiable independent use.--Greatestrowerever 20:59, 2 April 2007 (UTC)


[edit] William Mondesi

I'm sorry to inform you, but my article on William Mondesi is not at all nonsence, but rather a very touchy subject that we hold very close to our hearts. All informaion in this article is %100 true. I have added liks for reffernce.

--Theghostman2 13:15, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Speedy deletion

I noticed you tagged a page for speedy deletion. As a general practice, you shouldn't add a second SP template to a page with one. If you feel that the template doesn't properly describe the situation, it's better to replace it. The Evil Clown my contributions 16:43, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

I didn't look at the times, then. The Evil Clown my contributions 16:47, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] April 2007

Thank you for reverting vandalism to Wikipedia, which you did in Racist Source Tape. After you revert, I would recommend also warning the users whose edits you revert on their talk pages with an appropriate template or custom message. This will serve to direct new users towards the sandbox, educate them about Wikipedia, and a stern warning to a vandal may prevent him or her from vandalizing again. Thank you. Wǐkǐɧérṃǐť(Talk) (Contributions) 00:29, 13 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] American vs English spelling

It is a general Wikipedia policy to not change spelling from one to the other, as you did with Gorilla. If it was created with one spelling, then just leave it alone, unless there is some other reason to change it. wrp103 (Bill Pringle) (Talk) 21:20, 7 May 2007 (UTC)


[edit] POV dispute

Hi there: You may remember welcoming me to Wikipedia a while back. I wonder if I could trouble you to look at Mark Kirk (convict) and give an administrator's opinion on the POV question presented on the talk page? I don't know if this is the proper way to handle this, but I have no desire to initiate an edit war and thought a third-party opinion would be useful. Many thanks in advance for anything you can do to assist in this matter. Accounting4Taste 15:40, 4 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] User talk:Liseg

Hi, I see you warned this user that you were going to speedy his/her article, Gerlinger, but the tag was never placed on the article. So I went ahead and removed the warning from the user's talk page. I think Gerlinger should be turned into a disambig page and want to give the editor a chance to do some of the work. I left a note at Talk:Gerlinger, let me know what you think. I haven't looked into whether the individuals in question are notable enough to have their own articles, it could be someone's personal genaealogy project, but they may be notable per WP:LOCAL. Thanks! Katr67 14:44, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Keyword... Testing

I noticed that you proposed for deletion the article keyword.... I stumbled upon it today and it has changed very little. What was the outcome of that proposal... and why is that page still crap? 128.158.145.51 18:27, 15 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Article

I knew that the image was inaccurate by location, and I removed it. Thanks for the heads up though :)Sr13 17:53, 29 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Regarding your edit to User talk:72.191.185.179.

I have no idea what you were up to, but the placing of so many templates, with no explanation of why, and no signature, looks like an act of vandalism to me. If you have an explanation, please offer it. Otherwise, knock off the assinine behavior. Thanks. ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 22:46, 20 October 2007 (UTC)

Yes i'm not too sure how i managed to put that template there so many times. I copied and pasted it from the warning templates page but i'm not sure what happened.
The user had vandalised page Chico's Tacos a couple of minutes before.--Greatestrowerever 22:51, 20 October 2007 (UTC)
Well, if it was an honest mistake, I apologize for my tone. I am not sure how that happened either, but I understand that strange things happens sometimes. I have given him appropriate warnings for his vandalism. One more time, and he is blocked. Thanks for your response. Cheers! ---RepublicanJacobiteThe'FortyFive' 22:55, 20 October 2007 (UTC)


Your request to be unblocked has been granted for the following reason(s):

Autoblock of 194.81.80.52 lifted or expired.

Request handled by: Yamla (talk) 15:10, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

This tends to happen quite frequently as i use a shared IP address at Bath Spa University (194.81.80.52) --Greatestrowerever (talk) 15:08, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Apologies

Apologies for adding the warning to your page. I tried to revert some vandalism by 194.81.80.52 to Bath Spa University using an automated tool and it made a bit of a mess of the undo, popping the warning onto your page by mistake. I've removed the offending notice. Incidentally, you might like to add a watch to the user talk page for 194.81.80.52 to keep an eye on their bad behaviour. David Bailey (talk) 15:18, 13 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Please do not remove a message that says "Please do not remove this message"

Please do not remove maintenance templates from pages on Wikipedia without resolving the problem that the template refers to, or giving a valid reason for the removal. Your removal of this template has been reverted. This refers to this edit. --— Sebastian 06:53, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

You replied with

Please assume good faith in your dealings with other editors, which you did not on User talk:Greatestrowerever. Assume that they are here to improve rather than harm Wikipedia. --Greatestrowerever (talk) 14:11, 1 May 2008 (UTC)

This message does not explain why you state that I did not assume good faith. Conversely, did you try to assume good faith for me? --— Sebastian 06:29, 2 May 2008 (UTC)

[edit] The Oval

Hello Greatestrowerever. I reverted your changes to The Oval in Jason Gillespie's article as you had made (i think) a typo. You changed Brit Oval to Thr Oval. I'm not sure if Brit Oval or The Oval is preferred, just picked up on the typo. Cheers. Jonesy (talk) 22:43, 26 May 2008 (UTC)


I have changed it back without the typo, cheers for picking it up. --Greatestrowerever (talk) 13:38, 27 May 2008 (UTC)