Template talk:Green Bay Packers
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This template is part of WikiProject National Football League, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to the NFL on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Template | This article has been rated as Template-Class on the quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary on the comment page to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) |
|
 |
This template is part of WikiProject Green Bay Packers, a WikiProject dedicated to expanding the coverage of the Green Bay Packers on Wikipedia. For more information, visit the Project page. | |
| Template | This article has been rated as Template-Class on the quality scale. | |
| NA | This page is not an article and does not require a rating on the importance scale. | |
[edit] Question
Is "Green Bay Packers American Football Club, Inc." the actual name of the club or is it simply "Green Bay Packers Football Club, Inc." ? Smith03 22:51, 13 August 2006 (UTC)
- I noticed a similar thing on the Bears template. I think someone was thinking a bit creatively when they named these. I checked our old friend Google, and nothing comes up on either except Wikipedia mirrors. It's too bad, though, I like the formality. We could have called them GB Packers AFC. Xyzzyva 09:11, 3 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Color
I'm changing the colors slightly to approximate the official team colors, per www.ssur.org's list. Thoughts? --Chancemichaels 19:17, 20 March 2007 (UTC)Chancemichaels
[edit] WP:BRD
I recently reverted an edit to this template that made it navbox class. Imho, although the it was done to try and form unity (see {{Chicago Bears}}), that in its current state, it did not look good, as it looked very stretched, with massive amounts of white space. To me it looked like someone literally grabbed the old template and stretched it to twice its side. If consensus (or policy?) is to change these to navboxes, thats fine, just let's not make changes until we have a complete, good-looking template (i.e. use a sandbox first). I'll see what I can do today in making a working navbox. Cheers! « Gonzo fan2007 (talk ♦ contribs) 18:13, 22 March 2008 (UTC)
