Talk:Gregor the Overlander

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Novels This article is within the scope of WikiProject Novels, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to narrative novels, novellas, novelettes and short stories on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit one of the articles mentioned below, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and contribute to the general Project discussion to talk over new ideas and suggestions.
Stub This article has been rated as Stub-Class.
Low This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.
This article has an incomplete infobox template! - see Novels InfoboxCode or Short Story InfoboxCode for a pattern
This article is supported by the Fantasy task force. (with unknown importance)

[edit] Stub?

I've just finished this book. The article is pretty much a complete synopsis of the plot. What else should be added to the article so that it's no longer a stub? --MikeVitale 21:52, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

I, too, do not see what makes it a "stub". I'd appreciate some feedback on what it needs from the one who tagged it as a stub. Saugart (talk) 03:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Explanation of some changes I just made

Underland is always capitalized in the books. The books always say "Boots's", not "Boots'". So I made this page consistent in those ways. Saugart (talk) 03:35, 29 November 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Pronunciation of Luxa -- Include?

Today, MikeVitale took out the pronounciation guide to Luxa's name, summarizing his edit as: "We don't need a pronunciation "key" for Luxa."

However, in the first book, Suzanne Collins thought her readers did indeed need such a guide, and the pronunciation is not obvious. When Gregor meets Luxa, she writes:

"Louk-za?", said Gregor, trying to get the odd inflection right.

I think we should put back the pronunciation guide, and I think it should be the pronounciation that Suzanne Collins tells us to use. Any other thoughts on the matter?

I'm leaving a note on MikeVitale's talk page, suggesting that he might want to explain his reasoning here, in light of what I say above. Saugart (talk) 03:11, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

OK, I'm more than willing to discuss this point, Steve.
The first pronunciation key that I see in recent history for the page has it as "[loocsuh]" at [1].
This was changed 11 days later to "(looexa)" at [2].
Neither of these "pronunciation guides" are in IPA, which I have seen used elsewhere throughout Wikipedia, and neither of them are the "Louk-za" that you have quoted directly from the author.
Personally, if there's a pronunciation guide, I would think it should be in IPA (even though I can't make head or tail of IPA myself, but that's a topic for another day...) --MikeVitale 03:56, 4 January 2008 (UTC)

I think we're in violent agreement. Yes, the "guide" given in the article was incorrect. I'll try to put together IPA for the proper pronunciation. Saugart (talk) 12:24, 15 January 2008 (UTC)