Talk:Green Ramp disaster

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Disaster management, a collaborative effort to improve the coverage of Disaster management articles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

	This article is within the scope of the Aviation WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.	Aviation Portal
Start	This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated projects or task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- B-Class-1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points have appropriate inline citations. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- B-Class-2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain obvious omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- B-Class-3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- B-Class-4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- B-Class-5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Aircraft WikiProject

	This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.
B	This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.
Additional information and associated task forces: This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: criterion met Coverage and accuracy: criterion met Structure: criterion met Grammar: criterion met Supporting materials: criterion met Associated task forces (general topics): Military aviation task force Associated task forces (nations and regions): United States military history task force

[edit] Last line of the Aftermath

"The ramifications of the Air Force decision, since abandoned, of operating dissimilar aircraft (in this case C-130s and F-16s) at the same air base weren't examined by the two accident investigation boards"

This line doesn't fit the article; at least, not as it stands. The line suggests that the operation of dissimilar aircrafts should have been examined. If this type of investigation is a norm the line should be expanded to explain this. If accomplishing this investigation was an issue during the aftermath, the line should be expanded to explain this issue. If this line is the opinion of the author of Silent Knights it should be pulled. Now my recommendation, if at all able, is to expand the line and explain why the lack of this investigation was or should be an issue; otherwise, the line should be pulled. Thanks. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 75.34.14.49 (talk) 21:05, 25 March 2008 (UTC)

I added that line, but I don't mind if you pull it. Once this article has my undivided attention, and that will probably be some months from now, I'll fit that opinion better into the article by explaining, with sources, why that opinion is relevant. Cla68 (talk) 23:58, 25 March 2008 (UTC)