Talk:Great Comet of 1882

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Good article Great Comet of 1882 has been listed as one of the Natural sciences good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
September 26, 2005 Good article nominee Listed
WikiProject Space This article is within the scope of WikiProject Space.
Good article GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale.
Related projects:
WikiProject Astronomy WikiProject Astronomy
WikiProject Astronomical objects WikiProject Astronomical Objects
WikiProject Solar System WikiProject Solar System

This article has been rated but has no comments. If appropriate, please review the article and leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

Great Comet of 1882 is included in the 2007 Wikipedia for Schools, or is a candidate for inclusion in future versions. Please maintain high quality standards, and make an extra effort to include free images, because non-free images cannot be used on the CDs.

[edit] GA Re-Review and In-line citations

Members of the Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles are in the process of doing a re-review of current Good Article listings to ensure compliance with the standards of the Good Article Criteria. (Discussion of the changes and re-review can be found here). A significant change to the GA criteria is the mandatory use of some sort of in-line citation (In accordance to WP:CITE) to be used in order for an article to pass the verification and reference criteria. Currently this article does not include in-line citations. It is recommended that the article's editors take a look at the inclusion of in-line citations as well as how the article stacks up against the rest of the Good Article criteria. GA reviewers will give you at least a week's time from the date of this notice to work on the in-line citations before doing a full re-review and deciding if the article still merits being considered a Good Article or would need to be de-listed. If you have any questions, please don't hesitate to contact us on the Good Article project talk page or you may contact me personally. On behalf of the Good Articles Project, I want to thank you for all the time and effort that you have put into working on this article and improving the overall quality of the Wikipedia project. Agne 01:06, 26 September 2006 (UTC)


[edit] GA review

This article is currently having its GA status questioned, see the discussion at Wikipedia:Good article review. T Rex | talk 19:28, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

As a result of the fixes made during the reassessment process at good article reassessment all objections to this articles status on the GA list have been withdrawn. Good job on fixing it up, and keep working on it. This could be a Featured Article some day! For the archived disussion, see Wikipedia:Good article reassessment/Archive 29. --Jayron32|talk|contribs 01:34, 22 September 2007 (UTC)