User talk:Graham MIlner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Hi and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for your edits to Forrest River massacre and Hal Gibson Pateshall Colebatch. If you would like to add your own thoughts about an article, you can click "discussion" at the top of the article's page which will enable you to add a message for any other editors or visitors to the article. We try to make sure that information in articles is neutral, cited with sources and verifiable and your edits have been reverted in good faith. If there's anything I can help you with, you can leave a message on my talk page. Thanks! --kateshortforbob 15:22, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
Contents |
[edit] Your recent edits
Hi, there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. On many keyboards, the tilde is entered by holding the Shift key, and pressing the key with the tilde pictured. You may also click on the signature button 
located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot 15:57, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Your edits to help desk.
Please use the WP:SANDBOX to make test edits, your edits were very screwed up. Using the sandbox will help you learn how to format your edits properly. Look at our introduction, and after you finish that see WP:FIRST --lucid 16:01, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
- Also, please see our guidelines about conflict of interest. It's very bad form to create a Wikipedia article about yourself. If you do choose to create the article, make sure it is properly cited and adheres to our policy on neutral point of view. The bit you posted to the Help Desk violates all three of these policies linked, so I suggest you either rewrite it entirely or do not post it to Wikipedia. -- Kesh 17:29, 2 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Colebatch
The Colebatch article is a dreadful piece of hagiography written by the man himself. I don't know much about him but one well-informed and frank Wikipedian has described him thus:[1][2] Rest assured none of us have any interest in preserving a biased article written by its subject. If you insert the "thrice-failed WA liberal candidate" information into the article text, I shall do all in my power to make sure it stays there. But it looks silly in the infobox. Hesperian 00:04, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Forrest River massacre
Can you not find the time and enthusiasm to have a go at fixing this yourself? Here and at Colebatch, your contributions constitute valid hints that all is not well with the article. But if you think that a bunch of people are going to descend on the article and fix it up, just because you've commented on it, you are (unfortunately) mistaken. These articles won't get fixed unless you find the gumption to tackle them yourself. Meanwhile, we have to remove your comments because you haven't even tried to integrate them into the article. And that makes us look like we're actively defending unbalanced work. Hesperian 23:49, 26 September 2007 (UTC)
