Talk:Grand Lodge of Pennsylvania

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is part of WikiProject Freemasonry, a project to improve all Freemasonry-related articles. If you would like to help improve this and other Freemasonry-related articles, please join the project.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.


WikiProject Philadelphia
This article falls within the scope of WikiProject Philadelphia, a WikiProject interested in improving the encyclopedic coverage and content of articles relating to Philadelphia, its people, history, accomplishments and other topics. If you would like to help out, you are welcome to drop by the project page and/or leave a query at the project's talk page.
This article is also supported by WikiProject Pennsylvania.
B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

Article Grading: The article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places.

B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale.

[edit] comments

Please see my comment at Talk:Grand Lodge of Texas.

Nuttyskin 03:40, 23 August 2006 (UTC)

Nuttyskin has commented that American grand lodges do not warrant separate articles on Wikipedia due to the fact that the ritual and procedural differences between the Northern and Southern Jurisdictions in the U.S. are not great enough. He argues that the ritual and procedural differences between individual lodges in Scotland are more numerous than in the whole U.S. I would first take issue with his premise. Whereas it is true that the G.L. of Scotland does permit greater autonomy among its lodges in making decisions regarding ritual and procedural matters, I believe that you will find greater diversity between the rituals and procedures of, say, lodges in Massachusetts and Hawaii, or between Vermont and Arizona. But more to the point, I would comment that these articles on individual grand lodges are not studies about different grand lodge "rituals and procedures," as Mr. Nuttyskin seems to maintain. Rather, they are about the individual histories of these grand lodges, as well as other pertinent information. Why that is not obvious to him is a mystery to me. Further, the fact that he seems to be unaware that "Northern and Southern Jurisdictions" refers to Scottish Rite jurisdictions, and that these have nothing to do with the 51 individual U.S. Craft grand lodges, betrays his unfamiliarity with the subject of American Freemasonry.PGNormand 19:37, 30 June 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Building

It would be nice if there was some information about the building in the article. john k (talk) 02:28, 23 May 2008 (UTC)