Talk:Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia has been listed as one of the History good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
Article milestones Date Process Result January 3, 2007 WikiProject peer review Reviewed January 28, 2007 Good article nominee Listed March 30, 2007 Featured article candidate Not promoted March 2, 2008 Good article reassessment Kept Current Status: Good article

This article is within the scope of multiple WikiProjects. Click [show] for further details

Russia Portal Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia is part of the WikiProject Russian history, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Russian history. If you would like to participate, you can visit the project page, where you can join the project and see a list of open tasks. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. (assessment comments) Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. Grand Duchess Tatiana Nikolaevna of Russia is part of the WikiProject Saints, an effort to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Saints and other individuals commemorated in Christian liturgical calendars on Wikipedia. This includes but is not limited to saints as well as those not so affiliated, country and region-specific topics, and anything else related to saints. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Saints Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. Biography Portal GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ] This article is supported by the Royalty and nobility work group. More information about this article... This article has had a peer review by the Biography WikiProject, which has now been archived. The following comments have been left for this page: Short, but well written and refrenced. Some paragraphs are stubby, and would benifit with being expanded or merged. The bio could be broken further into two or three sections. I foud the opening sentence and the godparents para confusing and difficult to follow. + Ceoil 15:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Great work over the last few days. + Ceoil 20:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC) (edit) Russia Portal This page is within the scope of WikiProject Russia. If you would like to participate, please join the project and help with our open tasks. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the assessment scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the assessment scale. Christianity Portal This article is within the scope of WikiProject Christianity, an attempt to build a comprehensive guide to Christianity on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. If you are new to editing Wikipedia visit the welcome page to become familiar with the guidelines. GA This article has been rated as GA-class on the quality scale. Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale. Assessment comments The following comments were left by the assessors: (edit · refresh) Short, but well written and refrenced. Some paragraphs are stubby, and would benifit with being expanded or merged. The bio could be broken further into two or three sections. I foud the opening sentence and the godparents para confusing and difficult to follow. + Ceoil 15:22, 10 December 2006 (UTC) Great work over the last few days. + Ceoil 20:17, 21 December 2006 (UTC)

Contents 1 Ekaterinburg 2 This article looks really BAD 3 Tatiana's birthdate 4 GA Sweeps

[edit] Ekaterinburg

Okay, I replaced 'executed' with 'murdered' because I *strongly* believe that the massacre in Ekaterinburg was just that. A murder. Use of the word 'execution' would imply that due legal process was followed. It wasn't. If Tatiana had been convicted of some crime following a trial you could use the word 'executed'. But those circumstances do not apply here. In the editing history I see it used to say 'assassinated' at one time, I could live with that. Why on earth was it changed from the fairly reasonable 'assassinated' to the inaccurate and misleading 'executed' in the first place? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Luornuviolet (talk • contribs) 17:07, 6 February 2005

[edit] This article looks really BAD

This article looks like total crap -the photos are arranged in a very sloppy way. --Mrlopez2681 04:28, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

Most of the photos have been removed. Rearrange them if you think you can improve on the layout. --Bookworm857158367 07:18, 26 January 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Tatiana's birthdate

In 1900, the Old Style calender fell behind another day, so Tatiana's birthday is more accurately celebrated on the 11th of June. Clockworkgirl21 08:40, 23 September 2007 (UTC)

As Tatiana was born in 1897,when the calendar was 12 days behind-not 13, the 10thjeanne (talk) 14:37, 12 April 2008 (UTC) June birthdate is correct so the 11th June date should be deleted.Tatiana's rectified date of birth is 10 June 1897-all documents and books say this.

[edit] GA Sweeps

This article has been reviewed as part of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles/Project quality task force. I believe the article currently meets the criteria and should remain listed as a Good article. Although I have passed this article, I do have one significant problem which I feel the article's main contributors should address. The first paragraph is very messy with no narrative flow, instead appearing as an unconnected list of facts. This should be arranged into some sort of order, preferably chronologically. The article history has been updated to reflect this review. Regards, Jackyd101 (talk) 18:13, 2 March 2008 (UTC)

Article is very good;accurately describes the character and appearance of Tatiana.Just one suggestion-it needs more photos.There are some beautiful photographs of Tatiana available,jeanne (talk) 14:40, 12 April 2008 (UTC)they should be added here.