Talk:Gran Paradiso National Park

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	Gran Paradiso National Park has been listed as one of the Geography and places good articles under the good article criteria. If you can improve it further, please do. If it no longer meets these criteria, you can delist it, or ask for a reassessment.
	An entry from this article appeared on Wikipedia's Main Page in the Did you know? column on March 16, 2008.
April 7, 2008 Good article nominee Listed

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Protected areas (Rated GA-Class) This article is part of WikiProject Protected Areas, a WikiProject related to national parks and other protected areas worldwide. It may include the protected area infobox. WikiProject Italy (Rated GA-Class) Gran Paradiso National Park is within the scope of WikiProject Italy, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Italy on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit the article attached to this page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. GA This article has been rated as GA-Class on the Project's quality scale. (If you rated the article please give a short summary at comments to explain the ratings and/or to identify the strengths and weaknesses.) Mid This article has been rated as mid-importance on the importance scale.

This article was started in 2006, how can it be on DYK in 2008? --Gerrit ^CUTEDH 10:16, 16 March 2008 (UTC)

The DYK rules say that articles that have been expanded fivefold or more can be on DYK. This article was expanded. Bláthnaid 11:10, 19 March 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Good article

GA review – see WP:WIAGA for criteria

1. Is it reasonably well written?

   A. Prose quality:

   There are a lot of short sentences but the article is fluent and easy to read.

   B. MoS compliance:

2. Is it factually accurate and verifiable?

   A. References to sources:

   B. Citation of reliable sources where necessary:

   C. No original research:

   Sourcing is adequate.

3. Is it broad in its coverage?

   A. Major aspects:

   B. Focused:

   Seems to cover most of the typical aspects of national parks.

4. Is it neutral?

   Fair representation without bias:

   Hard to push a POV on an article like this, heh.

5. Is it stable?

   No edit wars, etc:

6. Does it contain images to illustrate the topic?

   A. Images are copyright tagged, and non-free images have fair use rationales:

   B. Images are provided where possible and appropriate, with suitable captions:

   Would be nice if you could find an appropriate photo for the flora section, if only because it sounds beautiful in spring. The photo of the ibex is supercute btw :D

7. Overall:

   Pass or Fail:

-- Naerii 07:14, 7 April 2008 (UTC)

Thanks for the review. By the way, I pushed the POV that ibex are adorable :p Bláthnaid 12:15, 7 April 2008 (UTC)