Graphene

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Not to be confused with Grapheme.

Graphene is a one-atom-thick planar sheet of sp2-bonded carbon atoms that are densely packed in a honeycomb crystal lattice. It can be viewed as an atomic-scale chicken wire made of carbon atoms and their bonds. The name comes from GRAPHITE + -ENE; graphite itself consists of many graphene sheets stacked together.

The carbon-carbon bond length in graphene is approximately 1.42 Å. Graphene is the basic structural element of all other graphitic materials including graphite, carbon nanotubes and fullerenes. It can also be considered as an infinitely large aromatic molecule, the limiting case of the family of flat polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons called graphenes.

Graphene is an atomic-scale chicken wire made of carbon atoms
Graphene is an atomic-scale chicken wire made of carbon atoms

Contents

[edit] Description

Perfect graphenes consist exclusively of hexagonal cells; pentagonal and heptagonal cells constitute defects. If an isolated pentagonal cell is present, then the plane warps into a cone shape; insertion of 12 pentagons would create a fullerene. Likewise, insertion of an isolated heptagon causes the sheet to become saddle-shaped. Controlled addition of pentagons and heptagons would allow a wide variety of complex shapes to be made, for instance carbon NanoBuds. Single-walled carbon nanotubes may be considered to be graphene cylinders; some have a hemispherical graphene cap (that includes 6 pentagons) at each end.

The IUPAC compendium of technology states: "previously, descriptions such as graphite layers, carbon layers, or carbon sheets have been used for the term graphene…it is not correct to use for a single layer a term which includes the term graphite, which would imply a three-dimensional structure. The term graphene should be used only when the reactions, structural relations or other properties of individual layers are discussed". In this regard, graphene has been referred to as an infinite alternant (only six-member carbon ring) polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon. The largest molecule of this type consists of 222 atoms and is 10 benzene rings across[1]. The onset of graphene properties, as compared to those of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) are not known. PAHs of 60, 78, and 120 carbon atoms have UV absorbance spectra that show a discrete PAH electronic structure, but a PAH of 222 carbon atoms has Raman bands similar to those in graphite.

[edit] Occurrence

It is now presumed that tiny fragments of graphene sheets are produced (along with quantities of other debris) whenever graphite is abraded, such as when drawing a line with a pencil.[2] However, it was physicists from the University of Manchester who first isolated and studied graphene (rather than PAH) in 2004, and defined it in Science[3] as:

Graphene is the name given to a single layer of carbon atoms densely packed into a benzene-ring structure, and is widely used to describe properties of many carbon-based materials, including graphite, large fullerenes, nanotubes, etc. (e.g., carbon nanotubes are usually thought of as graphene sheets rolled up into nanometer-sized cylinders). Planar graphene itself has been presumed not to exist in the free state, being unstable with respect to the formation of curved structures such as soot, fullerenes, and nanotubes.

The British researchers obtained relatively large graphene sheets (eventually, up to 100 microns in size and visible through a magnifying glass) by mechanical exfoliation (repeated peeling) of 3D graphite crystals; their motivation was allegedly to study the electrical properties of thin graphite films and, as purely two-dimensional crystals were unknown before and presumed not to exist, their discovery of individual planes of graphite was presumably accidental. Both theory and experiment previously suggested that perfect 2D structures could not exist in the free state. It is believed that intrinsic microscopic roughening on the scale of 1 nm could be important for the stability of 2D crystals.[4]

Similar work is ongoing at many universities and the results obtained by the Manchester group in their PNAS paper "Two-dimensional atomic crystals" have been confirmed by several groups.[5] For an example of a sample on the order of a monolayer, see figure 1.

Graphene sheets in solid form (e.g. density > 1g/cc) usually show evidence in diffraction for graphite's 0.34 nm (002) layering. This is true even of some single-walled carbon nanostructures[6]. However, unlayered graphene with only (hk0) rings has been found in the core of presolar graphite onions[7]. Transmission electron microscope studies show faceting at defects in flat graphene sheets[8], and suggest a possible role in this unlayered-graphene for two-dimensional dendritic crystallization from a melt[9].

Graphene is presently one of the most expensive materials on Earth, with a sample that can be placed at the cross section of a human hair costing more than $1,000 (as of April 2008).[10] The price may fall dramatically, though, if commercial production methods are developed in the future.

[edit] Properties

[edit] Atomic Structure

The atomic structure of isolated, single-layer graphene was studied by transmission electron microscopy (TEM) on sheets of graphene suspended between bars of a metallic grid.[4] Electron diffraction patterns showed the expected hexagonal lattice of graphene. Suspended graphene also showed "rippling" of the flat sheet, with amplitude of about one nanometer. These ripples may be intrinsic to graphene as a result of the instability of two-dimensional crystals[11][12][13], or may be extrinsic, originating from the ubiquitous dirt seen in all TEM images of graphene. Atomic resolution real-space images of isolated, single-layer graphene on silicon dioxide substrates were obtained[14][15] by scanning tunneling microscopy. Graphene processed using lithographic techniques is covered by photoresist residue, which must be cleaned to obtain atomic-resolution images [14]. Such residue may be the "adsorbates" observed in TEM images, and may explain the rippling of suspended graphene. Rippling of graphene on the silicon dioxide surface was determined by conformation of graphene to the underlying silicon dioxide, and not an intrinsic effect[14].

[edit] Electronic properties

Figure 1. This image was captured using a Digital Multimode AFM (atomic force microscope). Notice the step from the substrate at zero height to a graphene flake about 8 angstroms high, which is on the order of a monolayer.
Figure 1. This image was captured using a Digital Multimode AFM (atomic force microscope). Notice the step from the substrate at zero height to a graphene flake about 8 angstroms high, which is on the order of a monolayer. [16]

While electron transport in most condensed matter systems are accurately described by the non-relativistic Schrödinger equation, graphene is quite different from most conventional three-dimensional materials. Intrinsic graphene is a semi-metal or zero-gap semiconductor. The E-k relation is linear for low energies near the six corners of the two-dimensional hexagonal Brillouin zone, leading to zero effective mass for electrons and holes. [17] Due to this linear “dispersion” relation at low energies, electrons and holes near these six points behave like relativistic particles described by the Dirac equation for spin 1/2 particles. [18] Hence, the electrons and holes are called Dirac fermions, and the six corners of the Brillouin zone are called the Dirac points.[17] The equation describing the E-k relation is E = \hbar v_F\sqrt{k_x^2+k_y^2}; where vf, the Fermi velocity, is approximately 106m / s.[18]

[edit] Optical properties

Graphene's unique electronic properties produce an unexpectedly high opacity for an atomic monolayer, with a startlingly simple value: it absorbs πα = 2.3% of white light, where α is the fine-structure constant.[19] This has been confirmed experimentally, but the measurement is not precise enough to improve on other techniques for determining the fine-structure constant.[20]

[edit] Electronic transport

Experimental results from transport measurements show that graphene has a remarkably high electron mobility at room temperature, with reported values in excess of 15,000cm2V − 1s − 1. [13] Additionally, the symmetry of the experimentally measured conductance indicates that the mobilities for holes and electrons should be nearly the same.[17] The mobility is nearly independent of temperature between 10 and 100K [21][22][23], which implies that the dominant scattering mechanism is defect scattering. Scattering by the acoustic phonons of graphene limits the room temperature mobility to 200,000cm2V − 1s − 1 at a carrier density of 1012cm − 2[23][24]. The corresponding resistivity of the graphene sheet would be 10 − 6Ohm − cm, less than the resistivity of silver, the lowest resistivity substance known at room temperature[25]. However, for graphene on silicon dioxide substrates, scattering of electrons by optical phonons of the substrate is a larger effect at room temperature than scattering by graphene’s own phonons, and limits the mobility to 40,000cm2V − 1s − 1.[23]

Despite the zero carrier density near the Dirac points, graphene exhibits a minimum conductivity on the order of 4e2 / h. The origin of this minimum conductivity is still unclear. However, rippling of the graphene sheet or ionized impurities in the SiO2 substrate may lead to local puddles of carriers that allow conduction.[17] Several theories suggest that the minimum conductivity should be 4e2 / hπ. However, most measurements are of order 4e2 / h or greater,[13] and depend on impurity concentration.[26]

Recent experiments have probed the influence of chemical dopants on the carrier mobility in graphene.[27][26] Schedin, et al. doped graphene with various gaseous species (some acceptors, some donors), and found the initial undoped state of a graphene structure can be recovered by gently heating the graphene in vacuum. Schedin, et al. reported that even for chemical dopant concentrations in excess of 1012cm − 2 there is no observable change in the carrier mobility.[27]. Chen, et al. doped graphene with potassium in ultra high vacuum at low temperature. They found that potassium ions act as expected for charged impurities in graphene[28], and can reduce the mobility 20-fold.[26] The mobility reduction is reversible on heating the graphene to remove the potassium.

[edit] Spin Transport

Graphene is thought to be an ideal material for spintronics due to small spin-orbit interaction and near absence of nuclear magnetic moments in carbon. Electrical spin-current injection and detection in graphene was recently demonstrated up to room temperature[29][30][31]. Spin coherence lengths greater than 1 micron at room temperature were observed[29], and control of the spin current polarity with an electrical gate was observed at low temperature[30].

[edit] Magnetic effects

Besides the high mobility and minimum conductivity, graphene shows very interesting behavior in the presence of a magnetic field. Graphene displays an anomalous quantum Hall effect with the sequence shifted by 1 / 2 with respect to the standard sequence. Thus, the Hall conductivity is \sigma_{xy} = \pm {4e^2}/h \left(N + 1/2 \right), where N is the Landau level index and the double valley and double spin degeneracies give the factor of 4.[13] This remarkable behavior can even be measured at room temperature.[21] Bilayer graphene also shows the quantum Hall effect, but with the standard sequence where \sigma_{xy} = \pm {4Ne^2}/h . Interestingly, the first plateau at N = 0 is absent, indicating that bilayer graphene stays metallic at the neutrality point.[13]

Unlike normal metals, the longitudinal resistance of graphene shows maxima rather than minima for integral values of the Landau filling factor in measurements of the Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations, which show a phase shift of π, known as Berry’s phase.[17][21] The Berry’s phase arises due to the zero effective carrier mass near the Dirac points.[32] Study of the temperature dependence of the Shubnikov-de Haas oscillations in graphene reveals that the carriers have a non-zero cyclotron mass, despite their zero effective mass from the E-k relation.[21]

[edit] Graphene oxide

By oxidising and chemically processing graphene, and then floating them in water, the graphene flakes form a single sheet and bond very powerfully. These sheets have a measured tensile modulus of 32 GPa.[33]

[edit] Chemical modification

Soluble fragments of graphene can be prepared in the laboratory[34] through chemical modification of graphite. First, microcrystalline graphite is treated with a strongly acidic mixture of sulfuric acid and nitric acid. A series of steps involving oxidation and exfoliation result in small graphene plates with carboxyl groups at their edges. These are converted to acid chloride groups by treatment with thionyl chloride; next, they are converted to the corresponding graphene amide via treatment with octadecylamine. The resulting material (circular graphene layers of 5.3 angstrom thickness) is soluble in tetrahydrofuran, tetrachloromethane, and dichloroethane.

[edit] Thermal properties

The near-room temperature thermal conductivity of graphene was recently measured to be between (4.84±0.44) ×103 to (5.30±0.48) ×103 Wm−1K−1. These measurements, made by a non-contact optical technique, are in excess of those measured for carbon nanotubes or diamond. It can be shown by using the Wiedemann-Franz law, that the thermal conduction is phonon-dominated.[35] However, for a gated graphene strip, an applied gate bias causing a Fermi Energy shift much larger than kBT can cause the electronic contribution to increase and dominate over the phonon contribution at low temperatures.[36]

Potential for this high conductivity can be seen by considering graphite, a 3D version of graphene that has basal plane thermal conductivity of over a 1000 W/mK (comparable to diamond). In graphite, the c-axis (out of plane) thermal conductivity is over a factor of ~100 smaller due to the weak binding forces between basal planes as well as the larger lattice spacing.[37] In addition, the ballistic thermal conductance of a graphene is shown to give the lower limit of the ballistic thermal conductances, per unit circumference, length of carbon nanotubes.[38]

Despite its 2-D nature, Graphene has 3 acoustic phonon modes. The two in-plane modes have a linear dispersion relation, whereas the out of plane mode has a quadratic dispersion relation. Due to this, the T2 dependent thermal conductivity contribution of the linear modes is dominated at low temperatures by the T1.5 contribution of the out of plane mode.[38] The ballistic thermal conductance of Graphene is isotropic.[36]

[edit] Mechanical properties

Utilizing an atomic force microscope, research has recently been able to measure the spring constant of suspended Graphene sheets. Graphene sheets, held together by van der Waals forces, were suspended over silicon dioxide cavities where an AFM tip was probed to test its mechanical properties. Its spring constant was measured to be on the order of 1-5 N/m and its Young's modulus was 0.5 TPa, which differs from bulk graphite. These high values make Graphene very strong and rigid. These intrinsic properties could lead to the possibility of utilizing Graphene for NEMS applications such as pressure sensors, and resonators.[39]

Graphene is considered to be the first truly 2D crystal. There has been some discrepancy whether this assertion is truly valid or not. While an infinitely-large single layer of graphene would be in direct contradiction to the Mermin-Wagner theorem, a finite-size 2D crystal of graphene could be stable. The Mermin-Wagner theorem theorem states that a 2D crystal in a 3D environment would not remain ordered over long distances because of long wavelength fluctuations. It is believed that due to this instability, a large 2D structure will fold-up, or crumple to form a more stable 3D structure. Researchers have observed ripples in suspended layers of graphene.[4] It has been proposed that the ripples are caused by thermal fluctuations in the material. Graphene adjusts to the thermal fluctuations, which could threaten to destroy the structure, by adjusting its bond length to accommodate the fluctuations. Within this framework, it is debatable whether graphene is truly 2D or not, due to its natural tendency to ripple.[11][12][13]

[edit] Potential applications

[edit] Single molecule gas detection

Graphene makes an excellent sensor due to its 2D structure. The fact that its entire volume is exposed to its surrounding makes it very efficient to detect adsorbed molecules. Molecule detection is indirect: as a gas molecule adsorbs to the surface of graphene, the location of adsorption experiences a local change in electrical resistance. While this effect occurs in other materials, graphene is superior due to its high electrical conductivity (even when few carriers are present) and low noise which makes this change in resistance detectable.[27]

[edit] GNRs

Graphene nanoribbons (GNRs) are essentially single layers of graphene that are cut in a particular pattern to give it certain electrical properties. Depending on how the un-bonded edges are configured, they can either be in a Z (zigzag) or Armchair configuration. Calculations based on tight binding predict that zigzag GNRs are always metallic while armchairs can either can be either metallic or semiconducting, depending on their width. However, recent DFT calculations show that armchair nanoribbons are semiconducting with an energy gap scaling with the inverse of the GNR width. [40] Indeed, experimental results show that the energy gaps do increase with decreasing GNR width. [41] However, to date no experimental results have measured the energy gap of a GNR and identified the exact edge structure. [42] Zigzag nanoribbons are also semiconducting and present spin polarized edges. Their 2D structure, high electrical and thermal conductivity, and low noise also make GNRs a possible alternative to copper for integrated circuit interconnects. Some research is also being done to create quantum dots by changing the width of GNRs at select points along the ribbon, creating quantum confinement.[43]

Due to its high electronic quality, graphene has also attracted the interest of technologists who see them as a way of constructing ballistic transistors. Graphene exhibits a pronounced response to perpendicular external electric field allowing one to built FETs (field-effect transistors). In their 2004 paper[3], the Manchester group demonstrated FETs with a "rather modest" on-off ratio of ~30 at room temperature. In 2006, Georgia Tech researchers announced that they had successfully built an all-graphene planar FET with side gates[44]. Their devices showed changes of 2% at cryogenic temperatures. The first top-gated FET (on-off ratio of <2) was demonstrated by Aachen researchers in 2007[45]. Graphene nanoribbons may prove generally capable of replacing silicon as a semiconductor in modern technology.[46]

[edit] Integrated circuits

Graphene has the ideal properties to be an excellent component of integrated circuits. Graphene has a high carrier mobility, as well as low noise allowing it to be utilized as the channel in a FET. The issue is that single sheets of graphene are hard to produce, and even harder to make on top of an appropriate substrate. Researchers are looking into methods of transferring single graphene sheets from their source of origin (mechanical exfoliation on SiO2 / Si or thermal graphitization of a SiC surface) onto a target substrate of interest.[47] In 2008, the smallest transistor so far, one atom thick, 10 atoms wide was made of graphene[48].

[edit] Transparent conducting electrodes

Graphene's high electrical conductivity and high optical transparency make it a candidate for transparent conducting electrodes, required for such applications as touchscreens, liquid crystal displays, organic photovoltaic cells, and OLEDs. In particular, graphene's mechanical strength and flexibility are advantageous compared to indium tin oxide, which is brittle, and graphene films may be deposited from solution over large areas[49] [50].

[edit] Pseudo-relativistic theory

The electrical properties of graphene can be described by a conventional tight-binding model; in this model the energy of the electrons with wavenumber \mathbf{k} is

E=\pm\sqrt{\gamma_0^2\left(1+4\cos^2{\pi k_ya}+4\cos{\pi k_ya} \cdot \cos{\pi k_x\sqrt{3}a}\right)} [51],

with the nearest-neighbour-hopping energy \gamma_0\approx 2{.}8\ \mathrm{eV} and the lattice constant a\approx 1{.}42\ \mathrm{\AA}. Conduction- and valence band, respectively, correspond to the different signs in the above dispersion relation; they touch each other in six points, the "K-values". However, only two of these six points are independent, whereas the rest is equivalent by symmetry. In the vicinity of the K-points the energy depends linearly on the wavenumber, similar to a relativistic particle. Since an elementary cell of the lattice has a basis of two atoms, the wave function even has an effective 2-spinor structure. As a consequence, at low energies, the electrons can be described by an equation which is formally equivalent to the Dirac equation. Moreover, in the present case this pseudo-relativistic description is restricted to the chiral limit, i.e., to vanishing rest mass M0, which leads to interesting additional features:

v_F\vec\sigma\cdot\vec\nabla \psi(\mathbf{r})\,=\,E\psi(\mathbf{r})

Here v_F\approx 10^6\ \mathrm{m/s} is the Fermi velocity in graphene which replaces the velocity of light in the Dirac theory; \vec{\sigma} is the vector of the Pauli matrices, \psi(\mathbf{r}) is the two-component wave function of the electrons, and E their energy. [52]

[edit] History and Experimental Discovery

The term graphene first appeared[53] in order to describe single sheets of graphite as one of the constituents of graphite intercalation compounds (GICs); conceptually a GIC is a crystalline salt of the intercalant and graphene. The term was also used in the earliest descriptions of carbon nanotubes[54], as well as for epitaxial graphene[55], and polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons[56]. However, none of these examples constitutes isolated, two-dimensional graphene.

Larger graphene molecules or sheets (so that they can be considered as true isolated 2D crystals) cannot be grown even in principle. An article [57] in Physics Today reads:

"Fundamental forces place seemingly insurmountable barriers in the way of creating [2D crystals] ... Nascent 2D crystallites try to minimize their surface energy and inevitably morph into one of the rich variety of stable 3D structures that occur in soot. But there is a way around the problem. Interactions with 3D structures stabilize 2D crystals during growth. So one can make 2D crystals sandwitched between or placed on top of the atomic planes of a bulk crystal. In that respect, graphene already exists within graphite ... One can then hope to fool Nature and extract single-atom-thick crystallites at a low enough temperature that they remain in the quenched state prescribed by the original higher-temperature 3D growth."

Single layers of graphite were previously (starting from the 1970s) grown epitaxially on top of other materials [58]. This "epitaxial graphene" consists of a single-atom-thick hexagonal lattice of sp2-bonded carbon atoms, as in free-standing graphene. However, there is significant charge transfer from the substrate to the epitaxial graphene, and, in some cases, hybridization between the d orbitals of the substrate atoms and π orbitals of graphene, which significantly alters the electronic structure of the epitaxial graphene.

Single layers of graphite were also observed by transmission electron microscopy within bulk materials (see section Occurrence), in particular inside soot obtained by chemical exfoliation[10]. There have also been a number of efforts to make very thin films of graphite by mechanical exfoliation (starting from 1990 and continuing until after 2004)[10] but nothing thinner than 50 to 100 layers was produced during these years (read discussion).

The previous efforts did not result in graphene as we know it now, i.e. as "free standing" single-atom-thick crystals of a macroscopic size which are either suspended or interact only weakly with a substrate. It is not important whether graphene is suspended or placed on another (non-binding) substrate. In both cases, it is isolated and can be studied as such. Within this definition of graphene, it was first isolated by the Manchester group of Andre Geim who in 2004[3] finally managed to extract single-atom-thick crystallites from bulk graphite. He provided the first and unexpected proof for the existence of true (free-standing) 2D crystals. Previously, it was assumed that graphene cannot exist in the flat state and should scroll into nanotubes "to decrease the surface energy"[59][60] .

This experimental discovery of 2D crystal matter was openly doubted[4] until 2005 when in the same issue of Nature the groups of Andre Geim and Philip Kim of Columbia University have proved "beyond a reasonable doubt" that the obtained graphitic layers exhibit the electronic properties prescribed by theory. This theory was first developed by Philip R Wallace in 1947 as an approximation trying to understand the electronic properties of more complex, 3 dimensional graphite. He did not use word graphene and referred to "a single hexagonal layer". [61] Later, graphene crystals obtained by using the Manchester recipe were also made suspended and their thickness proved directly by electron microscopy[4].

[edit] Cultural references

Graphene was mentioned in comic 1111 of Questionable Content[62]

[edit] References

  1. ^ C. D. Simpson et al. Synthesis of a Giant 222 Carbon Graphite Sheet. Chemistry - A European Journal, 6 1424 (2002)
  2. ^ "...bits of graphene are undoubtedly present in every pencil mark" —Carbon Wonderland, Scientific American, April 2008
  3. ^ a b c Novoselov, K.S. et al. Electric Field Effect in Atomically Thin Carbon Films. Science 306, 666 (2004) doi:10.1126/science.1102896
  4. ^ a b c d Meyer, J. et al. The structure of suspended graphene sheets. Nature 446, 60-63 (1 March 2007)doi:10.1038/nature05545
  5. ^ Novoselov, K.S. et al. Two-dimensional atomic crystals. PNAS 102, 10451-10453 (January 26, 2005) doi:10.1073/pnas.0502848102
  6. ^ D. Kasuya, M. Yudasaka, K. Takahashi, F. Kokai and S. Iijima (2002) J. Phys. Chem. B 106:4947.
  7. ^ T. J. Bernatowicz, R. Cowsik, P. C. Gibbons, K. Lodders, B. Fegley Jr., S. Amari, and R. S. Lewis (1996) Constraints on stellar grain formation from presolar graphite in the Murchison meteorite, Astrophysical Journal 472:760-782
  8. ^ P. Fraundorf and M. Wackenhut (2002) The core structure of presolar graphite onions, Astrophysical Journal Letters 578:L153-156 (astro-ph/0110585,cond-mat/0606093)
  9. ^ E. S. Mandell (2007) Electron beam characterization of carbon nanostructures, Dissertation in Physics (University of Missouri - Saint Louis and Rolla).
  10. ^ a b c "Carbon Wonderland", Scientific American, April 2008
  11. ^ a b Carlsson, J. M. Graphene: Buckle or break. Nature Materials, 6(11), 801-802 (2007)
  12. ^ a b Fasolino, A., Los, J. H., & Katsnelson, M. I. Intrinsic ripples in graphene. Nature Materials, 6(11), 858-861 (2007)
  13. ^ a b c d e f Geim, A. K. and Novoselov, K. S. The rise of graphene. Nature Mater. 6, 183-191 (2007)
  14. ^ a b c Ishigami, Masa; et al. (11 May 2007). "Atomic Structure of Graphene on SiO2". Nano Lett. 7 (6): 1643-1648. doi:10.1021/nl070613a. 
  15. ^ Stolyarova, Elena; et al. (21 May, 2007). "High-resolution scanning tunneling microscopy imaging of mesoscopic graphene sheets on an insulating surface". Proceedings of the Natioanl Academy of Sciences 104: 9209-9212. doi:10.1073/pnas.0703337104. 
  16. ^ The image source is [1] (slide 17 image b) The height on the image is different. It is equal to 0.549 nm. See also more pictures of graphene here.
  17. ^ a b c d e J.-C. Charlier, P.C. Eklund, J. Zhu, and A.C. Ferrari, “Electron and Phonon Properties of Graphene: Their Relationship with Carbon Nanotubes,” from Carbon Nanotubes: Advanced Topics in the Synthesis, Structure, Properties and Applications, Ed. By A. Jorio, G. Dresselhaus, and M.S. Dresselhaus, Berlin/Heidelberg: Springer-Verlag, 2008
  18. ^ a b Avouris, P., Chen, Z., and Perebeinos, V. Carbon-based electronics. Nature Nano. 2 605-613 (2007)
  19. ^ Nair, R. R.; Blake, P.; Grigorenko, A. N.; Novoselov, K. S.; Booth, T. J.; Stauber, T.; Peres, N. M. R. & Geim, A. K. (2008-004-03), “Fine Structure Constant Defines Visual Transparency of Graphene”, [[Science (journal)|]], DOI 10.1126/science.1156965 
  20. ^ “Graphene Gazing Gives Glimpse Of Foundations Of Universe”, ScienceDaily, 2008-04-04, <http://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2008/04/080403140918.htm>. Retrieved on 6 April 2008 
  21. ^ a b c d Novoselov, K. S. et al. Two-dimensional gas of massless Dirac fermions in graphene. Nature 438, 197-200 (2005)
  22. ^ S.V. Morozov et al. Giant Intrinsic Carrier Mobilities in Graphene and Its Bilayer. Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 016602 (2008)
  23. ^ a b c Chen, J. H. et al. Intrinsic and Extrinsic Performance Limits of Graphene Devices on SiO2. Nature Nanotechnology 3, 206-209 (2008)
  24. ^ Akturk, A. and Goldsman, N. Electron transport and full-band electron-phonon interactions in graphene. Journal of Applied Physics 103, 053702 (2008)
  25. ^ Physicists Show Electrons Can Travel More Than 100 Times Faster in Graphene[2]
  26. ^ a b c Chen, J. H. et al. Charged Impurity Scattering in Graphene. Nature Physics published online April 13, 2008
  27. ^ a b c Schedin, F. et al. Detection of individual gas molecules adsorbed on graphene. Nature Mater. 6, 652-655 (2007)
  28. ^ Adam, S. et al. A self-consistent theory for graphene transport. Proc. Nat. Acad. Sci. USA. 104, 18392-18397 (2007)
  29. ^ a b Tombros, Nikolaos; et al. (2 August 2007). "Electronic spin transport and spin precession in single graphene layers at room temperature". Nature 448: 571-575. doi:10.1038/nature06037. 
  30. ^ a b Cho, Sungjae; Yung-Fu Chen, and Michael S. Fuhrer (19 September 2007). "Gate-tunable Graphene Spin Valve". Applied Physics Letters 91: 123105. doi:10.1063/1.2784934. 
  31. ^ Ohishi, Megumi; et al. (22 June 2007). "Spin Injection into a Graphene Thin Film at Room Temperature". Jpn. J. Appl. Phys. 46: L605-L607. doi:10.1143/JJAP.46.L605. 
  32. ^ Zhang, Y., Tan, Y. W., Stormer, H. L., and Kim, P. Experimental observation of the quantum Hall effect and Berry’s phase in graphene. Nature 438, 201-204 (2005)
  33. ^ Graphene Oxide Paper, Technology Transfer Program, Northwestern University
  34. ^ Sandip Niyogi, Elena Bekyarova, Mikhail E. Itkis, Jared L. McWilliams, Mark A. Hamon, and Robert C. Haddon . Solution Properties of Graphite and Graphene. J. Am. Chem. Soc. 128(24) pp. 7720–7721 (2006); (Communication) doi:10.1021/ja060680r
  35. ^ Balandi, A.A., Ghosh, S., Bao, W., Calizo, I., Teweldebrahn, D., Miao, F., and Lau, C.N. "Superior Thermal Conductivity of Single-Layer Graphene", Nano Letters ASAP (2008)
  36. ^ a b Saito, K., Nakamura, J., and Natori, A. "Ballistic thermal conductance of a graphene sheet", Physical Review B 76 115409 (2007)
  37. ^ "Graphite and Precursors", By Pierre Delhaes
  38. ^ a b Mingo N., Broido, D.A. "Carbon Nanotube Ballistic Thermal Conductance and Its Limits" Physical Review Letters 95, 096105 (2005)
  39. ^ Frank, I. W., Tanenbaum, D. M., Van Der Zande, A.M., and McEuen, P. L. Mechanical properties of suspended graphene sheets. J. Vac. Sci. Technol. B 25, 2558-2561 (2007)
  40. ^ Barone, V., Hod, O., and Scuseria, G. E. Electronic Structure and Stability of Semiconducting Graphene Nanoribbons Nano Lett. 6, 2748 (2006)
  41. ^ Han., M.Y., Özyilmaz, B., Zhang, Y., and Kim, P. Energy Band-Gap Engineering of Graphene Nanoribbons. Phys. Rev. Lett. 98, 206805 (2007)
  42. ^ As of Thursday, February 28, 2008
  43. ^ Wang, Z. F., Shi, Q. W., Li, Q., Wang, X., Hou, J. G., Zheng, H., et al. Z-shaped graphene nanoribbon quantum dot device. Applied Physics Letters, 91(5), 053109 (2007)
  44. ^ Carbon-Based Electronics: Researchers Develop Foundation for Circuitry and Devices Based on Graphite March 14, 2006 gtresearchnews.gatech.edu Link
  45. ^ Lemme, M. C. et al A graphene field-effect device. IEEE Electron Device Lett. 28, 282 (2007)
  46. ^ Bullis, Kevin (2008-1-28). "Graphene Transistors". Technology Review. Cambridge: MIT Technology Review, Inc. 
  47. ^ Chen, J., Ishigami, M., Jang, C., Hines, D. R., Fuhrer, M. S., and Williams, E. D. Printed graphene circuits. Advanced Materials, 19(21), 3623-3627 (2007)
  48. ^ BBC News article of 17 April 2008; Ponomarenko et al, Science, 320, 356 (2008)
  49. ^ Wang, X.; et al. (11 Dec 2007). "Transparent, Conductive Graphene Electrodes for Dye-Sensitized Solar Cells". Nano Letters. 
  50. ^ Eda, Goki; et al. (6 April 2008). "Large-area ultrathin films of reduced graphene oxide as a transparent and flexible electronic material". Nature Nanotechnology. 
  51. ^ P. R. Wallace, The Band Theory of Graphite, Physical Review 71 (1947) 622–634
  52. ^ A. H. Castro Neto, F. Guinea, N. M. R Peres, K. S. Novoselov, A. K. Geim, The electronic properties of graphene, e-print arXiv.org:0709.1163v2 , (2007), [3]
  53. ^ Mouras, S. ‘’et al.’’ Synthesis of first stage graphite intercalation compounds with fluorides. ‘’Revue de Chimie Minerale’’ ‘’’24’’’ 572 (1987).
  54. ^ Saito, R. ‘’et al.’’ Electronic structure of graphene tubules based on C60. ‘’Phys. Rev. B’’ ‘’’46’’’ 1804 (1992).
  55. ^ Forbeaux, I. ‘’et al.’’ Heteroepitaxial graphite on 6H-SiC(0001): Interface formation through conduction-band electronic structure. ‘’Phys. Rev. B’’ ‘’’58’’’ 16396 (1998).
  56. ^ Wang, S. ‘’et al.’’ A new carbonaceous material with large capacity and high efficiency for rechargeable Li-ion batteries. ‘’Journal of the Electrochemical Society’’. ‘’’147’’’, 2498 (2000).
  57. ^ Geim, A. K. & MacDonald, A. H. Graphene: Exploring carbon flatland. Physics Today, 60 35-41 (Aug 2007)
  58. ^ For a review, see Oshima, C. and Nagashima, A. Ultra-thin epitaxial films of graphite and hexagonal boron nitride on solid surfaces. J. Phys.: Condens. Matter 9, 1 (1997)
  59. ^ H. Shioyama J. Mater. Sci. Lett. 20, 499 (2001)
  60. ^ L. M. Viculis et al. Science 299, 1361 (2003)
  61. ^ Wallace, P. R. The band theory of graphite. Physical Review 71 622-633 (1947)
  62. ^ Jacques, Jeph (2008). Buckeyballs of Flavor(#1111). questionablecontent.net. Retrieved on 2008-4-01.

[edit] See also

[edit] External links