Category talk:Grammar frameworks

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

I was wondering how broad we want this category to be. X-bar theory and Tree-adjoining grammar are not really grammar frameworks in the usual sense of the phrase, but I suppose it doesn't do much harm to have them in this category. What do people think? Cadr 09:25, 19 Apr 2005 (UTC)

Oh, I didn't know there was a common definition in use...I just made up the title as a place to throw all the theories of grammar floating around Category:Grammar. The theories of grammar which make up the majority of the entries here fall into various classes...it might be a good idea to collect articles on those classes in their own category, which I take it would include TAGs. Alternatively, we could make the category tree divide grammar theories into appropriate subclasses, but I think there may be mroe than one way to classify each one, so that sounds like it might be too confusing. Ithink it's fine for this category to remain "Articles about grammar frameworks and about things related to grammar frameworks", whether just for now or in the long run. -- Beland 00:57, 25 Apr 2005 (UTC)