User talk:GPHemsley/Archive 5
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
The Beatles and forking articles
I have a problem that I would like to impart to all you good 'Beatles project' editors, and it is this:
- Should anything directly Beatles-related be in the main Beatles' article, and only 'personal' stuff put into the Lennon, McCartney, Harrison, and Starr articles? I have the disturbing feeling that I'm repeating stuff in both Lennon and McCartney articles that should only be in the main article.
- But... if only personal stuff is included in the individual Beatles' articles, would it make them too confusing/random, to read?
Please answer (on a stamped and self-addressed postcard please) on our talk page. (This might be more interesting than talking about MBEs... :) andreasegde, Mr Hornby, and Sir Sean de Garde 15:21, 7 January 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter, Issue 9, January 2007
Per your request, here is a link to the latest issue: Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 009 Enjoy! ++Lar: t/c 21:56, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
re upcoming Beatles newsletter 010.
I had a quick look at your contrib history; you are working on Beatles related stuff outside of my watchlist so do you want to add anything to the newsletter? I keep on harping on about the usual subjects, so some other titles news might be refreshing. If you want to play around with the layout then that is fine (although I may insist in calling you Lead Ed) but I would like to keep the silly stuff in; as it does seem good for morale. Cheers. LessHeard vanU 22:22, 4 February 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 10, February 2007
Per your request, here is a link to the latest newsletter Wikipedia:WikiProject_The_Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue_010 ++Lar: t/c 05:06, 8 February 2007 (UTC)
Image:Beatleslogo.gif
Are you confusing SVG with PNG? SVG is a vector format and so "resolution" is rather a meaningless term - you could create one at a particular pixel size, but you would still be able to scale it to any resolution without pixellation, which is exactly what the "Low-resolution" clause in the Logo template is about. Converting to PNG could be a good idea - the format allows semitransparency which could let the drop shadow work. I suppose you could go via SVG to get a PNG that did that, but the {{ConvertToSVG}} tag would still be inappropriate. Stannered 00:11, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
- I wasn't confusing the two, no, but I suppose you make a good argument. I should've learned after having the same problem with Image:ACDClogo.png, but I guess it slipped my mind. Personally, I don't think issues with fair use of solid-color logos such as these are as serious as elaborate, multicolored logos, but I guess that's just me. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 00:57, 21 March 2007 (UTC)
WikiProject The Beatles Newsletter Issue 012 – April 2007
Wikipedia:WikiProject The Beatles/Outreach/Newsletter/Issue 012 --kingboyk 13:09, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
Yesterday and Today
Hi Gordon. I finally endeavored to fix the damage I did to the Yesterday and Today article when I kludged the edit history by doing a cut-and-paste move. At my request, an admin has now combined the edit histories under the newer page title (the one with no ellipsis). So, I think we're as good as new. Just thought you should know. Cheers, GentlemanGhost 02:18, 12 May 2007 (UTC)
- Alright, cool. Thanks for letting me know. —Gordon P. Hemsley→✉ 20:58, 13 May 2007 (UTC)
elinks userbox now ready.
The "User browser:ELinks" userbox is now ready (not sure how relevant that is to you, but there it is). --Slashme 13:28, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image (Image:ACDClogo.png)
Thanks for uploading Image:ACDClogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:16, 14 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Anthology2cover.jpg
 |
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Anthology2cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 19:31, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Anthology2cover.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Anthology2cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:50, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Non-free use disputed for Image:Anthology3cover.jpg
|
This file may be deleted. |
Thanks for uploading Image:Anthology3cover.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale you have provided for using this image under "fair use" may be invalid. Please read carefully the instructions at Wikipedia:Non-free content and then go to the image description page and clarify why you think the image qualifies.
If it is determined that the image does not qualify under fair use, it will be deleted within a couple of days according to our Criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.Betacommand (talk • contribs • Bot) 04:52, 23 May 2007 (UTC)
Wikipedia New York Meet-Up
Howdy! Please come to the First Annual New York Wikipedian Central Park Picnic. R.S.V.P. @ Wikipedia:Meetup/NYC
--David Shankbone 23:35, 12 June 2007 (UTC)
