Talk:Government financial reports

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

There are a bunch of sources that could be cited for this topic that could be intrepreted as "soapbox" and get the artical deleted like CAFR so, I wont bother as the NPOV trolls will shure delete it and weekipedia can cooperate in the censorship of these mega important issues funding crony capitalism and graft and cooruptions of global scale. Jack Abramoff being a icecube vs Iceberg by comparison.

I should be curious that no "week"ipedian considers the topic of enuff importance to get a "expert" friend to stick their neck out to write a artical on Comprehensive Annual Financial Reports as was requested before that page was deleted. Check out the cashed versions on the web attributed to wikipedia to see some of the spam that was used as an excuse to delete the page. Why cant a less spam version like the one I wrote be posted and protected to avoid the cashed versions misrepresenting wikipedia standards? Beats me. ```70.35.195.31 18:40, 9 November 2006 (UTC)

I added another category for the bottom but I dont see what needs cleanup unless somebody just wants to semi-discredit the topic with out doing the "cleanup". Tag and run? 209.209.140.21 18:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC)

[edit] rewrite perspective

Just thot some yall would like ta know this page was rewritten by a ignert hillbilly from easturn cantuck that has no background in accounting but has a grasp of the topic from studyin' on it fer 10years; Fore ye go taggin it fer cleanup ya otta cite what the heck needs cleaning up? Tag and run? 209.209.140.19 (talk) 06:07, 18 November 2007 (UTC)