Talk:Governance, Risk Management, and Compliance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of the Business and Economics WikiProject. |
| Stub | rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale |
| Low | rated as low-importance on the assessment scale |
Please see Wikipedia:Neologisms. "The use of neologisms should be avoided in Wikipedia articles because they are not well understood, are not clearly definable, and will have different meanings to different people. Determining which meaning is the true meaning is not only impossible, it is original research as well — we don't do that here at Wikipedia." Also, the blog "citations" are a problem unless you can establish the writer's expertise in his/her field. This article does not seem to have a coherent topic or coherent writing. Stringing together a series of dictionary words with wide usage in various contexts is not a good way to name a Wikipedia article unless the terms together have acquired a very clear cross-cultural meaning. If this article isn't cleaned up, I suggest the article be deleted. --Busy Stubber 03:05, 29 October 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Quality of sources
The quality of sources in this article seem very poor. I would tend to trust a comment from a Forrester Research analyst made on a FR blog, but OCEG's blog doesn't seem a good source -- and a paragraph here seems to be plugging this organization. I've requested more citations. ---- Busy Stubber (talk) 18:51, 16 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Relevance of the topic
I'm new to Wikipedia talks. I'd just like to say that the GRC topic is becoming incresingly relevant to the business community, and that this wikipedia page is providing relevant and useful information on the topic, so, even if me too think the page should be edited to be improved, I don't think it should be deleted. --Andrea.pederiva (talk) 09:04, 1 April 2008 (UTC)
- I agree - this is now a common business term - I'd like to see this cleaned up Egret (talk) 18:37, 13 May 2008 (UTC)
