User talk:Gonbal2

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Welcome!

Hello, Gonbal2, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits have not conformed to Wikipedia's Neutral Point of View policy (NPOV), and have been reverted. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media.

There's a page about the NPOV policy that has tips on how to effectively write about disparate points of view without compromising the NPOV status of the article as a whole. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! --Asteriontalk 00:15, 25 October 2007 (UTC)

Contents

[edit] Reliable sources

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, adding content without citing a reliable source, as you did to Andalusia, is not consistent with our policy of verifiability. This is especially important when dealing with biographies of living people, but applies to all Wikipedia articles. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. If you are already familiar with Wikipedia:Citing sources please take this opportunity to add your original reference to the article. Thank you.--Strothra (talk) 18:15, 26 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] December 2007

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. . Asteriontalk 16:54, 28 December 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Spanish people - 3RR warning

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Spanish people. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. Gonbal2 you just revert to a vandal's version and you do not even talk about it or explain in a edit summary! This can not be The Ogre (talk) 19:56, 27 February 2008 (UTC)
You have been reported. The Ogre (talk) 20:02, 27 February 2008 (UTC)

[edit] Peru

Hello. I've just reverted your recent edits to Peru because, according to Wikipedia guidelines, articles have to be verifiable. The figures currently provided in the Peru article are properly referenced to reliable sources (in this particular case to publications by the Peruvian Central Bank and the Peruvian National Institute of Statistics). Those figures should not be changed unless a more recent estimate is available and a new reliable reference is provided. Until that time it is better for the article to stick to its sources. Greetings, --Victor12 (talk) 23:20, 28 February 2008 (UTC)