User talk:Golich17
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Delta fleet table
FYI, I left a response on the the Delta Air Lines talk page about the fleet table.
Unfortunately, there is no set date for all aircraft to be in the new configuration. However, they are being converted gradually. I think the ex-TWA ETOPS 757s should be done by the summer, though. For the 737-800s, I heard about half of them now feature the new configuration. Currently, only four of the domestic 767-300s feature the new configuration. The domestic 767-300s that currently have new configration are ships 121, 131, 133, and 139. I don't know about the international 767-300ERs, though. ANDROS1337 22:55, 9 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Reverting
Hey man, if you want to revert back to an edition of a page, you can look at the history, click the date of the edit you want, then click "edit this page" and then "Save page". It'll save you from having to do 10 undos! Hope this helps, --Matt (talk) 21:57, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- Thank you so much. I've been editing with Wikipedia for so long now and haven't had to deal with anything like this. Thanks again.--Golich17 (talk) 23:31, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
- It is pretty odd - you were very thorough restoring it, I'm impressed!
- If you think you'll need to do this again, I recommend Popups and Rollback. Popups help you do this more quickly by having a Javascript menu to help you auto submit the historical page, and rollback undoes all the consecutive edits by the most recent editor. --Matt (talk) 23:49, 21 March 2008 (UTC)
[edit] WP Airlines
Reasonable point Golich17 about discussion, I was just trying to support Russavias change was not just a random whim, as you rightly say these are only guidelines. MilborneOne (talk) 11:08, 7 April 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Something special...
The Editor's Barnstar | ||
For nearly dominating my watchlist with your contributions to American Airlines and Continental Airlines, I award you "The Editor's Barnstar." Keep up the good |
[edit] Airline alliance templates
Hi. Sure, there's nothing wrong "per se" with the previous formatting. But, the bullet dividers aren't exactly discreet, the Firefox linewrap bug (see Wikipedia:Line break handling#Nowraplinks shortcomings and Wikipedia talk:Line break handling#Firefox bug) isn't accommodated, and, since they use {{Navbox}}, why not use its group-list nature? Makes it easier to see the groups of links at a glance. Also, the dark background used in the Oneworld template makes it less than straightforward to see the title at a glance, so suggest it or the text color is amended. What do you think? Thanks for your message. Sardanaphalus (talk) 03:01, 15 May 2008 (UTC)
- Thanks for your reply. Since I left the message above, I've learnt that I might have misunderstood when and where this Firefox bug is meant to be accommodated (see here), so that {{nowrap begin}} etc formatting may be unnecessary after all. Sardanaphalus (talk) 00:19, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
-
- It turns out that using the Firefox bug-proof formatting is a good idea, so I guess it's okay for me to reinstate it in the alliance templates? Sardanaphalus (talk) 12:41, 16 May 2008 (UTC)
[edit] US Airline Pilots Association article - Solicitation for input
Hello. I'm soliciting opinions regarding the controversy surrounding the formation of the US Airline Pilots Association. Please see Talk:US Airline Pilots Association#Controversy and add you opinion. -- Tcncv (talk) 00:34, 22 May 2008 (UTC)