Talk:Gold Coast Titans 2007

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

NEW! Task force on State of Origin NEW!
Want to help improve Rugby league articles? Join WikiProject Rugby league
WikiProject Rugby league The article on Gold Coast Titans 2007 is supported by the WikiProject on Rugby League, which is to improve the quality and coverage of rugby league related articles on Wikipedia.
If you wish this article to be re-assessed, go to our Assessment Department and add it to the list.
If you wish this article to be peer-reviewed, go to our Peer Review Department and add it to the list.
If you rated this article you may want to leave some comments here on how the article can be improved.
Start This article has been rated as start-Class on the quality scale.
Low This article has been rated as low-importance on the importance scale.
Flag
Portal
Gold Coast Titans 2007 is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.
??? This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

[edit] Merge

Keep, I don't tjink it should be deleted, it just needs to have info and we can't have that until the 07 season kicks off so???????? 202.83.118.27 05:00, 8 December 2006 (UTC)

Delete. Info already available at 2007 NRL Season, can easily be referenced and summarised from section on Gold Coast Titans. Gonzerelli 14:28, 13 December 2006 (UTC)

Keep, Eventually it will be like the Brisbane Broncos' detailing of each season's results, which I think is great. All clubs should have this. Although I think the Season Summary table could be compressed a little to include an extra column for the Position as well, rather than having it as a whole separate table which is unsightly and makes little sense, since the Season Summary table conveniently lists all the rounds anyway. Jeff79 04:54, 2 March 2007 (UTC)

Strong Keep This will be a good article granted it is fixed up a bit. William.hall15 (talk) 06:18, 18 January 2008 (UTC)