User talk:Goferwiki

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

• Wikipedia:Tutorial
• Wikipedia:Help desk
• M:Foundation issues
• Wikipedia:Policy Library

Contents 1 Chemtrail -> Chemtrail theory 2 Come back to HAARP 3 New User Page 4 Neuroscience and God 5 RE:Institute of National Remembrance 6 AfD nomination of The Seldon Plan

[edit] Chemtrail -> Chemtrail theory

I renamed the article "chemtrail theory". I think this is a more accurate name for the article, a name which puts the reader in the right "frame of mind", and a name that does not imply truth or untruth. A theory is a proposed, but not fully proven explanation. A theory is likely to be believed by some but disputed by others. I hope that this addresses your concerns regarding NPOV. - Pioneer-12 16:42, 26 Apr 2005 (UTC)

[edit] Come back to HAARP

Can I convince you to come back to the High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program article and help straighten it out a bit? I think the amount of useful information about HAARP will crowd out the conspiracy theory material - perhaps that deserves its own page? John Elder 09:34, 15 Jun 2005 (UTC)

[edit] New User Page

Hi, Goferwiki, I saw your note on the New Users Page. I hope you'll decide to stay; I know how it can be to contribute from your hard earned expertise and have someone revert it without comment. Not everyone here respects the value of a doctorate (trust me, I know, I have two), but many do. The best thing to do is to make your changes, and if they are reverted, change them back. Leave an edit summary note asking reverters to make arguments on the talk page, and post your sources there. If you're right about what you're saying, then eventually your position will win out. If you'd like to talk about your frustration, feel free to leave me a note. -- Essjay · Talk June 30, 2005 02:28 (UTC)

[edit] Neuroscience and God

What are your thoughts on mysticism and its relation to neuroscience? The works of Andrew Nerberg and Eugene d'Aquili stand out as truly thought provoking, and more importantly, discussion building. Just say the word 'God' without adding the addendum "whatever you may define It to be, personality or 'mere' neurological bonus" and immediately the reductionists square off with theists.

[edit] RE:Institute of National Remembrance

please, do not blank article sections or remove cited sources without first discussing on the talk page, as that constitutes vandalism.

--Jadger 16:46, 3 April 2007 (UTC)

[edit] AfD nomination of The Seldon Plan

An article that you have been involved in editing, The Seldon Plan, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Seldon Plan. Thank you. --BJBot (talk) 17:19, 28 December 2007 (UTC)