Talk:GNU Simpler Free Documentation License

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

[edit] "an idealogical statement."

I added the text regarding Section 0a of the draft licence. I've referred to the section as an "idealogical statement", however I'm a little concerned that this may be a loaded term - another editor might want to consider changing "idealogical" to something more neutral if appropriate. Brendan Cosman 00:25, 6 December 2006 (UTC)

No, even the GNU project would freely admit that their project and licenses do have quite idealogical goals. It's not a bad or non-neutral term, though with the passing of time it has apparently had increasingly negative connotations. --Gwern (contribs) 01:18 6 December 2006 (GMT)

[edit] Cross licensing?

I read the article, and it says that the GFDL allows cross licensing with the GSFDL if no GSFDL-incompatible features are used. I am sure they mean that the GFDL is compatible with the GSFDL if no GSFDL-incompatible features are used. Emanla Eraton 18:52, 25 July 2007 (UTC)