GNU Hurd

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

"Hurd" redirects here. For other uses, see Hurd (disambiguation).
GNU Hurd
Developed by Thomas Bushnell
Roland McGrath
Marcus Brinkmann
Others
Latest release K16 / December 30, 2007 (2007-12-30); 167 days ago
OS GNU
Genre Kernel
License GNU General Public License
Website http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/

GNU Hurd (usually referred to as the Hurd) is a free software computer operating system kernel, released under the GNU General Public License. It consists of a set of servers (or daemons, in Unix terminology) that work on top of a microkernel; together they form the kernel of GNU. The Hurd aims to surpass Unix kernels in functionality, security, and stability, while remaining largely compatible with them.

HURD is a mutually recursive acronym, standing for HIRD of Unix-Replacing Daemons, where HIRD stands for HURD of Interfaces Representing Depth. It is also a play on the words herd of gnus, reflecting how it works.[1]

Contents

[edit] Development history

Development on the GNU operating system began in 1984 and initially made good progress. Free GNU tools started to acquire a good reputation and were often adopted in preference to inferior proprietary tools provided by system vendors. By the early 1990s, the only major component missing was the kernel.[2]

Development on the Hurd began in 1990 after an abandoned kernel attempt in 1986, based on the research TRIX operating system developed by Professor Steve Ward and his group at MIT's Laboratory for Computer Science (LCS).[3] According to Thomas Bushnell, the initial Hurd architect, their early plan was to adapt the 4.4BSD-Lite kernel and, in hindsight, "It is now perfectly obvious to me that this would have succeeded splendidly and the world would be a very different place today".[4] However, in 1987, due to a lack of cooperation from the Berkeley programmers, Richard Stallman proposed instead to use the Mach microkernel developed at Carnegie-Mellon University. Work on this was delayed for three years due to uncertainty over whether CMU would release the Mach code under a suitable license.[3]

With the release of the Linux kernel in 1991, the primary consumer of GNU's userland components soon became the Linux operating system, prompting the coining of the controversial term GNU/Linux.

Development of the Hurd has proceeded slowly. Despite an optimistic announcement by Stallman in 2002[5] predicting a release of GNU/Hurd later that year, the Hurd is still not considered suitable for production environments. Development in general has not met expectations, and there are still bugs and missing features.[6] This has resulted in a poorer product than many (including Stallman) had expected.[7]

The Debian project, among others, have worked on the Hurd project to produce binary distributions of Hurd-based GNU operating systems for PC compatible systems.[8]

[edit] Architecture

Unlike the majority of Unix-like kernels, the Hurd builds on top of a microkernel which is responsible for providing the most basic kernel services — coordinating access to the hardware: the CPU (through process management and scheduling), RAM (via memory management), and other various input/output devices (via I/O scheduling) for sound, graphics, mass storage, etc. In theory the microkernel design would allow for all device drivers to be built as servers working in user space, but today most drivers of this kind are still contained inside GNU Mach, the currently used microkernel. That is because initially user-space drivers would have suffered from performance loss, due to the overhead of the Mach interprocess communication. With the performance of today's machines, it is possible that this overhead would no longer cause a significant performance problem.[9]

[edit] Choice of microkernel

From early on, the Hurd was developed to use GNU Mach as the microkernel. This was a technical decision made by Richard Stallman, and one that he later saw as a mistake.[10]

From 2004 onward, various efforts were launched to port the Hurd to more modern microkernels. The L4 microkernel was the original choice in 2004, but progress slowed to a halt. In 2005, there was a discussion of whether to change to L4.sec (a different L4 microkernel) or to Coyotos (EROS successor).[11] Although no formal decision was made, most of the Hurd developers' time has gone into thinking about Coyotos,[12] especially since 2006.

Other Unix-like systems working on top of the Mach microkernel include OSF/1, Lites, and MkLinux. These are implemented as a single Unix server which, together with the microkernel, replaces the monolithic kernel of a traditional Unix system. Mac OS X and NEXTSTEP use monolithic kernels based on Mach, often incorrectly believed to be microkernels.

In the Hurd, elements of a monolithic kernel are instead handled by separate server processes. Such a "set of servers" was one of the main design goals of Mach, but Hurd appears to be the first Mach-based system to be implemented in this way. (QNX and Minix-3 are similar but based on their own microkernels.) It is not entirely clear why this happened, but it might have something to do with the high performance hit of Mach IPC.[citation needed] Hurd also aims to be microkernel-independent.[citation needed]

OSKit-Mach began as a branch of the GNU Mach 1.2 kernel, but since the release of GNU Mach 1.3 was merged as the new GNU Mach 2.x mainline.

In 2005, Hurd developer Neal Walfield finished the initial memory management framework for the L4/Hurd port, and Marcus Brinkmann ported essential parts of glibc; namely, getting the process startup code working, allowing programs to run, thus allowing the first user programs (trivial ones such as the hello world program in C) to run.

In 2006, Marcus Brinkmann and associates met with Jonathan Shapiro (a primary architect of the Coyotos Operating System) to aid in and discuss the use of the Coyotos kernel for GNU/Hurd. These discussions continued into 2007, but progress is slow.[citation needed]

[edit] Unix extensions

 This section does not cite any references or sources. (March 2007)
Please help improve this section by adding citations to reliable sources. Unverifiable material may be challenged and removed.

A number of traditional Unix concepts are replaced or extended in the Hurd.

Under Unix every program running has an associated user id, which normally corresponds to the user that started the process. This id largely dictates the actions permitted to the program. No outside process can change the user id of a running program. A Hurd process, on the other hand, runs under a set of user ids, which can contain multiple ids, one, or none. A sufficiently privileged process can add and remove ids to another process. For example there is a password server that will hand out ids in return for a correct login password.

Regarding the file system, a suitable program can be designated as a translator for a single file or a whole directory hierarchy. Every access to the translated file, or files below a hierarchy in the second case, is in fact handled by the program. For example a file translator may simply redirect read and write operations to another file, not unlike a Unix symbolic link. The effect of Unix mounting is achieved by setting up a filesystem translator (using the "settrans" command). Translators can also be used to provide services to the user. For example, the ftpfs translator allows a user to encapsulate remote FTP sites within a directory. Then, standard tools such as ls, cp, and rm can be used to manipulate files on the remote system. Even more powerful translators are ones such as UnionFS, which allows a user to unify multiple directories into one; thus listing the unified directory reveals the contents of all the directories (a feature that is missing in many Unixes, although available in modern BSDs).

The Hurd requires a multiboot-compliant boot loader, such as GRUB.

[edit] Architecture of the servers

According to the Debian documentation there are 24 servers (18 core servers and 6 file system servers) named as follows:[13]

[edit] Core servers

  • auth (authentication server) : Receives requests and passwords from programs and gives them an ID, which changes the privileges of the program.
  • crash (crash server):
  • exec (execution server): Translates an executable image (currently ELF and a.out are supported) to a runnable image in memory.
  • fifo (FIFO translator):
  • new-fifo (new FIFO server)
  • firmlink (the firmlink translator):
  • fwd (forward server)
  • hostmux (host multiplexer server);
  • ifsock (server for sockets interface):
  • init (init server)
  • magic (magic server)
  • null (null server): implements /dev/null and /dev/zero
  • pfinet (pfinet server)
  • pflocal (pflocal server)
  • proc (process server)
  • symlink (symbolic link translator)
  • term (terminal server)
  • usermux (user multiplexer server)
 Please help improve this section by expanding it.
Further information might be found on the talk page or at requests for expansion.


[edit] Filesystem servers

The ext2fs server "ext2fs"
The ext2 filesystem translator. It receives disk blocks from the microkernel and gives files and directories to the applications.
The iso filesystem server "isofs"
The translator for the ISO 9660 filesystem. Translates blocks of a CD or DVD to files and directories for the applications.
The nfs server "nfs"
See Network File System.
The ufs server "ufs"
Translator for the BSD filesystem of the same name, UFS.
The ftp filesystem translator "ftpfs"
See File transfer protocol
"storeio"
The storage translator

The servers collectively implement the POSIX API, with each server implementing a part of the interface. For instance, the various filesystem servers each implement the filesystem calls. The storage server will work as a wrapping layer, similar to the VFS of Linux.

[edit] GNU/Hurd-based distributions

See also List of LiveDistros#GNU-based

[edit] Error messages

A "computer bought the farm" message is an error message displayed on GNU Hurd when one of the servers that provide kernel-like functions reaches a "hopeless" situation (after which it is usually terminated).[14] This is a rough equivalent of a kernel panic in monolithic Unix-like kernels.

Its corresponding error code in the GNU C Library is EIEIO.

[edit] See also

Free software Portal

[edit] References

  1. ^ The GNU Hurd - GNU Project - Free Software Foundation (FSF)
  2. ^ Linux and the GNU Project
  3. ^ a b The GNU Hurd History, "How it Started". Retrieved on 2006-08-27.
  4. ^ Peter H. Salus. The Hurd and BSDI. The Daemon, the GNU and the Penguin. Retrieved on 2006-08-08.
  5. ^ John Ribeiro (2002-03-11). Free Software Sees Gnu Loose of Linux. PC World. Retrieved on 2006-08-08.
  6. ^ http://www.gnu.org/software/hurd/hurd.html#status
  7. ^ "This is the way, also, that people thought was the cleanest possible way to design kernels back in 1990. Well, it took many many many years to get this kernel to run at all, and it still doesn't run well, and it looks like there may be fundamental problems with this design, which nobody knew about back in 1990." "The Free Software Movement and the Future of Freedom; March 9th 2006", transcript of a lecture given by Richard Stallman in Zagreb.
  8. ^ Debian GNU/HURD project
  9. ^ Re: Device drivers in Mach?
  10. ^ Richard Stallman: In Defense of Red Hat. “I take full responsibility for the technical decision to develop the GNU kernel based on Mach, a decision which seems to have been responsible for the slowness of the development. I thought using Mach would speed the work by saving us a large part of the job, but I was wrong.”
  11. ^ Re: A comment about changing kernels
  12. ^ Re: seL4, L4.sec and coyotos mess
  13. ^ Preliminary GNU/Hurd User Interface Description
  14. ^ Hurd FAQ: What does "computer bought the farm" mean ?.

[edit] External links

v • d • e
GNU Project
History GNU is not a gnu
Licences
Software
Public speakers
Other topics