Talk:GMC Syclone

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

WikiProject Trucks This article is within the scope of WikiProject Trucks,
a WikiProject which aims to improve all articles related to trucks.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale.
??? This article has not yet received an importance rating within truck articles.

This article has been rated for quality and/or importance but has no comments yet. If appropriate, please review the article and then leave comments here to identify the strengths and weaknesses of the article and what work it will need.

This article is within the scope of Wikipedia Project Automobiles, a collective approach to creating a comprehensive guide to the world of automobiles on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you are encouraged to visit the project page, where you can contribute to the discussion.
Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the Project's quality scale.
??? This article has not yet been assigned a rating on the importance scale.

-No don't merge them, they're two completely different vehicles. That would be like combining the F-150 and Ford Expedition page just because they use the same platform. --70.121.147.250 01:07, 25 March 2007 (UTC)

-Seconded for the same reason. Don't merge. 129.21.122.181 18:06, 8 April 2007 (UTC)

-3rd for DON'T merge. That would not be accurate if they were.

- Shouldnt be merged but should definitely reference one another

-Create a more generic SyTy page perhaps? I don't think it's the same as the Expedition and F-150 because of the rarity of these vehicles. I don't even think the merger is still a discussion, but since the vehicles share similar components it seems like it could be. And it seems like most owners consider either one respectable; I have yet to see any Syclone owners who dislike or don't especially like Typhoons, and vice versa. Zchris87v 17:46, 5 July 2007 (UTC)

-The Scyclone and the Typhoon just share the same drivetrain, but are different. Another vote for DO NOT merge.

-Another vote for DON'T merge the 2 pages. I see it more like combining the Grand National, The WE4, and the Turbo-T just because they share a drivetrain. Would be ludicrous to do so. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 65.121.54.251 (talk) 16:48, August 22, 2007 (UTC)