Talk:Glue stick
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Contents |
[edit] Image
[1] Reverted: The image doesn't really add or show anything, and it's only marginally less blurry than the one already in the article. What we need is a nice, sharp imape of a glue stick, preferably with the cap off. Femto 12:07, 14 August 2006 (UTC) why dose not glue stick to its own sick
I have added an image of a glue stick that is a lot sharper. I will take an alternative with the cap off. Bilky asko 19:50, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
I have added the version of the glue stick with the cap removed. Bilky asko 20:10, 7 December 2006 (UTC)
This is clearly a shameless advertisement for Pritt. Consider revising to adhere to neutrality standards.
If the image was changed to Brand "X", would it be a shameless advertisement for Brand "X"? Bilky asko (talk) 21:47, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Glue stick examples
Why does Pritt glue have to be the only model for the glue sticks article? I mean I do respect the fact that Pritt is the first stick onto all surfaces glue stick but then I just have this sensation that whosoever wrote this article was trying to advertise the Pritt brand.
I see your point but there are few resources that can be found on other brands. One thing that can be done straight away is having the main image displaying more than one brand, and more than one size of glue stick. I will try to add as much as possible to balance out Pritt. I will add images as soon as possible.Bilky asko (talk) 21:56, 21 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Style
The whole article seems in need of re-writing. For example it has this non sequitur:
Glue sticks are designed to glue paper and card together, as the glue is not as strong as some liquid based variants.
--SilasW (talk) 17:13, 7 February 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Blue-stick
Should something about the blue-stick/blu-stick be mentioned?--Coin945 (talk) 11:24, 28 February 2008 (UTC)
