From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
|
This article is within the scope of WikiProject FBI. |
|
Start (Rating Comments: [{{fullurl:Talk:Glock_22/Comments|action=edit}} add]/view) |
This article has been rated as Start-Class |
|
Mid |
This article has been rated as Mid-Importance |
|
|
|
This article is within the scope of the WikiProject Firearms; If you would like to join us, please visit the project page where you can find a list of open tasks. If you have any questions, please consult the FAQ. |
??? |
This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale. |
Additional information: |
|
|
|
This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status:
- Referencing and citation: not checked
- Coverage and accuracy: not checked
- Structure: not checked
- Grammar: not checked
- Supporting materials: not checked
|
|
This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the Glock 22 article.
|
|
|
Article policies
|
[edit] GLOCK vs. Glock
Discussion on this topic here. As of late there isn't much in the way of variety where the discussion participants are concernd, so I'm posting this as an FYI to those who maybe aren't watching the Glock article. Thernlund (Talk | Contribs) 00:03, 18 January 2007 (UTC)
[edit] An article for every Glock?
Since all Glock models are mechanically very similar, does it make sense to have a separate article for every model? --68.102.156.139 01:51, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- While the mechanics are similiar, the history-usage-and references differ. If they were combined to one article it would be extremely long. — xaosflux Talk 03:35, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
- Keep them seperate. They are different weapons. Robert Brockway 06:17, 14 July 2007 (UTC)