Talk:Global Television Network
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Canada and related WikiProjects, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to articles on Canada-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project member page, to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. |
| Mid | This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. |
 |
Contents |
[edit] Unattributed criticism
The following paragraph makes charges against Global but does not say who was making them, other than "some critics":
Some critics charge that Global's news programs have become more conservative, and in particular more supportive of Israeli and American government policy in the Middle East. Global's Middle East correspondent Martin Himmell's documentary Confrontation at Concordia, on conflicts between pro- and anti-Zionist students at Concordia University, was strongly criticised for bias and selective reporting but was aired serveral times in prime time by the network in 2003.
The second sentence is particularly poor, since it uses the passive voice to avoid attitbuting the criticism to anyone. -- Mwalcoff 01:13, 7 November 2005 (UTC)
Globbal's pro-Israeli bias is well known, and can be shown every evening by their coverage of Middle Eastern events. Nlsanand 00:41, 13 September 2006 (UTC)
If the bias is well-known then you should have no trouble finding a source. 85.24.184.24 04:11, 20 August 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Global Edmonton
For those that don't know, Global Edmonton or CITV used to be known as ITV before becoming a Global affiliate station. Mr. C.C. 06:59, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Global Confusion
I've never understood Global. Global TV in Ottawa advertizes itself as "Ontario's source for news", but I have yet to see a Global reporter leave the greater Toronto area. A murder in Ottawa would (and has) gone unreported while "Ontario's source for news" reports on street sweepers in Toronto. Every anchor, reporter, and advertisement is very careful to use the word "Ontario" and never the word "Toronto", which seems very disingenuous. Even traffic and weather reports are branded as being for Ontario despite being solely for Toronto. Even having read the article, I am still left completely confused as to which markets Global claims to cover, and which markets it actually covers. --24.200.34.209 05:21, 23 August 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Another simsub complaint
In the 2005-06 season, Global would go to commercial at the wrong time during live broadcasts of Saturday Night Live, usually as TV Funhouse or commercial parodies began. Since the NBC feed was substituted, viewers sometimes missed entire segments of the live broadcast. I know this definitely happened with Global Maritimes (definitely one of the most incompetent Canadian broadcasters around), but I don't know how much the rest of the network was affected. I had heard some of this happened with Global Quebec too but I'm not sure if it happened as much as with the Maritimes affiliate. 74.115.226.191 19:16, 25 September 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:Global hd.jpg
Image:Global hd.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images lacking such an explanation can be deleted one week after being tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot (talk) 16:45, 2 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Global's privately-owned affiliates
Does anyone know if Global and the Jim Pattison Group have any agreements regarding Jim Pattison's E! affiliates? I mean, all of Global's stations are owned-and-operated, and the majority of the E! stations are.... does Global have any problems with another owner's stations airing their programming, or did Global welcome JP Group's affiliation into its network "family"? I know of no plans for Global to buy the JP Group stations... RingtailedFox • Talk • Contribs 20:10, 5 February 2008 (UTC)
