Glen Canyon Dam
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| Glen Canyon Dam | |
 Glen Canyon Dam on 19 June 2005 |
|
| Official name | Glen Canyon Dam |
|---|---|
| Impounds | Colorado River |
| Creates | Lake Powell |
| Locale | Page, Arizona, USA |
| Maintained by | Bureau of Reclamation |
| Length | 1,560 foot (475 m) |
| Height | 583 foot (178 m) |
| Width (at base) | 300 foot (91 m) |
| Construction began | 1956 |
| Opening date | 1966 |
| Bridge information | |
| Carries | US 89 |
Glen Canyon Dam is a dam on the Colorado River at Page, Arizona, USA, operated by the United States Bureau of Reclamation. The purpose of the dam is to provide water storage for the arid southwestern United States, and to generate electricity for the region's growing population. Damming the river flooded Glen Canyon and created a large reservoir called Lake Powell. Just downstream from the dam is an arch bridge that carries U.S. Route 89.
Contents |
[edit] History
The dam is part of the Colorado River Storage Project for the Upper Colorado Basin.it is part of Utah and Arizona. The dam crosses in the middle of the states crossing line. According to the Bureau of Reclamation, "The project furnishes the long-time regulatory storage needed to permit States in the upper basin to meet their flow obligation at Lees Ferry, Arizona, (as defined in the Colorado River Compact) and still use their apportioned water."[1]
Construction of the dam began in 1956 by the industrial conglomerate, Merritt-Chapman & Scott. Although the dam was not dedicated until 1966, it was able to begin blocking the flow of the river in 1963.
The Sierra Club and other environmental organizations opposed the original plan for damming the Colorado River, including the construction farther upstream of the Echo Park Dam, which would have inundated part of Dinosaur National Monument. When the plan was modified, however, the Sierra Club dropped its objection to the Glen Canyon Dam. Its then Executive Director, David R. Brower, later called this decision one of the biggest mistakes of his career:
Glen Canyon died, and I was partly responsible for its needless death. Neither you nor I, nor anyone else, knew it well enough to insist that at all costs it should endure. When we began to find out it was too late. (From The Place No One Knew, a Sierra Club book published in 1963)
The dam has continued to attract opposition. In the novel The Monkey Wrench Gang, by Edward Abbey, the protagonists believe strongly that the dam has ruined the river. Since 1996, the Sierra Club has called for increasing the release of water, so that a more natural flow of the river is restored and Lake Powell is gradually drained.
Thirty-one years after the dam's completion, Senator Barry Goldwater of Arizona, who originally supported the project, stated in an interview that he would be happier without the lake and expressed regret for voting in favor of its construction.[2] Despite opposition from many environmental groups, the dam, Lake Powell, and the Glen Canyon National Recreation Area remain popular tourist destinations.
Continued population growth in the western and southwestern United States places more demands on the system of dams and reservoirs on the Colorado River for water, power, and recreational purposes, which are important to the infrastructures and economies of the western United States.[3]
High volume flows are now periodically released to assist in re-arrangement of river beaches in the canyon, deemed necessary to prevent overgrowth of exotic plant species such as tamarisk and balance the needs of the human population with that of the environment.
[edit] Description
The Glen Canyon Dam is a 710-foot (216-m) high structure. The concrete arch dam has a crest length of 1,560 foot (475 m) and contains 4,901,000 cubic yards (3,747,000 m³) of concrete. The dam is 25 foot (8 m) wide at the crest and 300 foot (91 m) wide at the maximum base. Its height above the Colorado River is 583 foot (178 m).
The Glen Canyon hydroelectric powerplant, at the toe of the dam, consists of eight 155,500-horsepower (116,000 kW) Francis turbines. Total nameplate generating capacity for the powerplant is 1,296,000 kilowatts. Eight penstocks through the dam convey water to the turbines.
[edit] Operations
The dam's hydroelectric plant generated 3.209 billion kilowatt-hours (11.55 PJ) of electricity in 2005. Average residential per-capita electrical usage in Arizona in 2001 was 4,937 kilowatt-hours [4]; per these statistics, the plant generates enough electricity to supply about 650,000 persons in the region with household power.
California, Arizona, Nevada, and New Mexico receive about 8.2 million acre-feet (10.1 km³) of water each year from the Glen Canyon Dam. About 85% of the water goes to irrigation projects, and the rest is diverted to urban areas.[5]
[edit] Environmental impacts
Owing to this dam, there has not been the periodic flooding that would wash away and renew sand banks along the portion of the Colorado River that transits the Grand Canyon. Because of the stability of the sand banks, several non-native species of plants became established, adversely affecting the native wildlife.
An environmental impact statement was completed in 1995, which concluded that some effort needed to be made to re-enact flooding events on the river.[6] Public hearings were held in Salt Lake City, Denver, Phoenix, Flagstaff, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and Washington, D.C. More than 17,000 comments were received during the scoping period, reflecting national attention and the interest of people in the Western States. In accordance with the findings, a controlled flood was held in late March and early April of 1996.
The controlled floods appear to have had a beneficial effect upon the downstream ecosystem. However, the results of an experimental flood in early 2005 were mixed. New beaches were built for the rafting industry and the natural sandbars that species in the area depend on were partially restored.
In 2006, the Bureau of Reclamation announced plans to develop another Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) on the implementation of a long-term experimental plan for operational activities at Glen Canyon Dam and other management actions on the Colorado River. The EIS continues efforts of the Glen Canyon Dam Adaptive Management Program created to protect resources downstream of Glen Canyon Dam, including the Grand Canyon, through adaptive management and experimentation.
This EIS process implements the provisions of the settlement agreement recently executed between the United States and the Center for Biological Diversity and other environmental groups in the Center for Biodiversity et al. v. Kempthorne litigation regarding the operation of Glen Canyon Dam. In conformance with the National Environmental Policy Act, this EIS effort will include public involvement and scoping and will consider a range of options and evaluate their ability to address scientific understanding and resource protection objectives.
[edit] References
- ^ Glen Canyon Powerplant. United States Bureau of Reclamation (2005). Retrieved on 2008-05-15.
- ^ McKinnon, Shaun (May 28, 2007). At age 50, dam still generates love, hate. azcentral.com. Retrieved on March 14, 2008.
- ^ Verdoia, Ken. Interview: Barry Wirth. KUED. Retrieved on March 14, 2008.
- ^ 2001 per capita consumption of electricity in Arizona
- ^ Economic benefits of Glen Canyon Dam
- ^ Suggestions for Further Reading. United States Bureau of Reclamation. Retrieved on 2008-04-27.
[edit] External links
- Glen Canyon National Recreation Area
- Glen Canyon Dam page from the Bureau of Reclamation
- Images of Glen Canyon before it was flooded
- Article by David Brower on restoring Glen Canyon
- The Glen Canyon Institute
- 1995 Glen Canyon EIS
- New Environmental Impact Assessment of the Glen Canyon Dam (2006)
- Glen Canyon Dam is at coordinates Coordinates:
|
||||||||||||||||||||
