User talk:GlassCobra/Archive 2

This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Archives Archive 1: April 26, 2007 - August 27, 2007 Archive 2: August 25, 2007 - September 16, 2007 Archive 3: September 17, 2007 - October 16, 2007 Archive 4: October 17, 2007 - November 5, 2007 Archive 5: November 5, 2007 - November 13, 2007 Archive 6: November 14, 2007 - November 23, 2007 Archive 7: November 24, 2007 - December 12, 2007 Archive 8: December 13, 2007 - January 3, 2008 Archive 9: January 3, 2008 - January 26, 2008 Archive 10: January 26, 2008 - February 13, 2008 Archive 11: February 13, 2008 - February 27, 2008 Archive 12: February 27, 2008 - March 17, 2008 Archive 13: March 17, 2008 - April 6, 2008 Archive 14: April 7, 2008 - April 28, 2008 Archive 15: April 29, 2008 - June 8, 2008

August 25, 2007 - September 16, 2007

User:Chcfea

I caught and reverted both of his vandalisms on your page. I put him up on AIV right afterwards, so no worries. He'll catch an indef one way or the other. Peace. Bullzeye ^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 20:36, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

I've always said a good no-BS way to determine what an editor's made of is how many times their user page has been vandalized. Needless to say, you seem to be pissing off just the right people :) Bullzeye ^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 20:41, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

No joke, brother. Been there done that...it sucks the Project's such a magnet for the mental midgets of the world. I guess if they weren't here they'd be on Slashdot or Usenet (or throwing rocks at cars outside their house)...oh well, I figure all we can do is make like Jim Morrison: keep our eyes on the road and our hands upon the wheel. Bullzeye ^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 20:54, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

No prob, boss. Drop me a line if you ever need help with something. Or if you want a nom for WP:RFA. Bullzeye ^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 21:23, 25 August 2007 (UTC)

The End's Not Near, It's Here

Hey, just letting you know that the edits you reverted by 74.117.11.63 were clearly removal of vandalism; it even clearly states "removing vandalism" in the edit summaries. You even warned the person for fighting vandalism. Please take closer looks at the content that you're restoring from now on. Donkey Kong? Come on, man. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 04:27, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

My mistake. I apologized to the anon editor. Owen× ☎ 15:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Pardon me, but I'd like a response to my previous comment, or at least an apology to the anon editor involved. User:OwenX has already apologized. Actually, I find your warning highly ironic: "Please be careful when editing pages and do not remove content from Wikipedia without a good reason." I consider fighting vandalism a pretty good reason. As I said before, please be more diligent in reading the content that you are restoring. Even with a cursory glance you would have seen terms like "Donkey Kong" and "Rosie O'Donnell" and known that the content did not belong. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 16:44, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

I'm sorry but, in fairness, your first message didn't actually ask for a reply or even an apology for that matter. Anyway I meant to reply to the message on your talk page and his after I archived it but I got distracted with bigger, real life issues. Here is where I'm asking for forgivness for not getting back to you sooner. Clearly reverting their edit was a huge mistake and I apoligised to anon user for it. I also deleted the warning from his talkpage. Also when I reverted his edit, he didn't actually have an edit summary filled it saying "undoing vandalism" etc as it was blank. It was unexplained thats why I gave anon user that particular warning. But I apoligised now as I was clearly mistaken and everybody is happy and can move on from this experience. AngelOfSadness talk 18:57, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

It's fine. No need to worry about it. I'll see you around. Happy Editing :D AngelOfSadness talk 19:11, 26 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey, I just wanted to say thanks for the message about my edits. I was wondering why I was getting warnings when it was obviously vandalism and I had stated it the second time around. You didn't need to message them about it but you did, and I really appreciate it so thanks again! :) (74.117.11.63 04:23, 6 September 2007 (UTC))

Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.

P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 04:59, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Warnings removal by User:Smallers23

Just thought you should know that users are allowed to remove warnings on their talk pages, although archiving is prefered. It is taken to indicate that the warning has been received. Please see WP:TALK#User_talk_pages. Regards, Flyguy649 ^talk _contribs 05:04, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Thank you!

Thanks for your kind welcome! Actually, I've been knocking around for a while here, under different IPs. So far, I've usually done small fixes, such as spelling errors and the like, while trying to get a good grasp of how things work around here. Anyway, here's something for you:

124.148.93.216 has smiled at you! Smiles promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by smiling at someone else, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy editing!
Smile at others by adding {{subst:Smile}} to their talk page with a friendly message.

Have a wiki-wiki day! 124.148.93.216 06:29, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

What

dont tell me what to do! i like to make stuff bout myself! —Preceding unsigned comment added by Joshua Erwin (talk • contribs) 07:10, August 27, 2007 (UTC)

manila hotel

will be adding more information please wait thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilbertyl (talk • contribs)

Hi thanks for fixing up manila hotel I'll help post more articles here if I've stumbled into any noteworthy articles thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Wilbertyl (talk • contribs) 03:27, August 28, 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of David J silver

Ill Intelleks Page Deletion

Illintelleks 18:53, 27 August 2007 (UTC)

Hey GlassCobra

I still don't understand why my article was deleted from the Wiki. It said something about duplicated text on another website but this text appears everywhere as biographical information released from Blindog Records LLC in Vermont, USA. Why can't I recreate the article following the proper guidelines? considering several people feel this is something that should be documented in the wiki. I left out the link to the groups Myspace.com account which the core bot picked up as a red flag and asked me to remove, which I did promptly.

Let me know how I can fix the article following the proper guidelines, rather than just deleting it and telling me I can't make it ever again.

Thanks for your time

-Andrew
Ill Intelleks Management
http://www.illintelleks.com
management@illintelleks.com

Email a User

Should work now if you're still interested. Bullzeye ^{(Complaint Dept./Brilliant Acts)} 05:07, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for August 27th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. Ralbot 05:58, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

BUPC

The BUPC has full support for MfD, so we'll finish out the round in my sandbox if you wish to continue, this will be the final round, and I have preserved the archive in my sandbox too as an archive. Notify me if you wish to continue. My sandbox is located at User:Kkrouni/Sandbox--Kkrouni/こかるに/Ккроуни/ΚκρΩυνι 16:55, 28 August 2007 (UTC)

John bellamy

On August 25th I switched the CSD tag on this article to PROD. A short while later you switched it back with an edit summary of "Are you serious? The MTV is obviously a lie, and there's a karate box for a non-notable form of martial arts. This is obvious CSD." Yes I was serious. A claim to have videos on MTV, even a false claim, is a claim to notability, which is all an article needs to avoid CSD A7. Admins should not evaluate the truthfullness of claims to notability when deciding whether or not to delete via A7. Hoaxes are not speedy candidates. Dsmdgold 15:46, 30 August 2007 (UTC)

Re:Redwall Portal

Hey, the first step is deciding what components you want to include. We can do virtually anything we like here, but most good portals include four content components of one kind or another. You may find it useful to look over some other portals (Portal:Narnia, for example, although there don't seem to be any featured portals on similar topics).

If you'd like, I can put together a rudimentary skeleton and then we can futz with it. Carom 12:19, 4 September 2007 (UTC)

Page deletion

I recently became involved with volunteering at the Aishel House, and thought to publish a page on wikipedia about it. I did not mean to simply promote it, but as of the fact that i am not the best writer around i guess i did a bad job. Is there any way that i can retain the article on my computer for my own personal documentation? as the article is now deleted i dont know what to do. if that type of page does not belong on wikipedia, then i am more than happy if it is deleted. btw i am new to wikipedia and was wondering if there was a more user friendly tutorial available online. thankks peretzlaz —Preceding unsigned comment added by PeretzLaz (talk • contribs)

Perry Publishing and Broadcasting.

The entry for Perry Publishing and Broadcasting is needed as this company owns several radio stations that are entries at Wikipedia.

As for links, if you had checked at the bottom of the entry, you would have noted that I've had left links to both the company's site as well as their newspaper. The corporate site has more information about their history as well as their acquistions.

I believe that you had jumped the gun on this issue.

(Robynwatts 14:09, 6 September 2007 (UTC))

Perry Publishing and Broadcasting (part 2)

GlassCobra,

I've included a link to a recent article from "Black News" about Perry Publishing and Broadcasting recent station acquisitions in Augusta, Georgia from Radio One and this has been posted with the Wiki article.

[1]

Sorry that there is no other "outside" information online at this time. There was a newspaper article about the purchase of several stations in Oklahoma, but has since been archive. I believe in factual infomation myself, but sometimes it is hard to come by online.

Robynwatts 22:18, 6 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 3rd, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 03:21, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Redwall

Anything in particular you would have me do? --Solar Sunstorm 03:25, 7 September 2007 (UTC)

Xoriat

Remember to warn the article creator. I've done so this time around ;) Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:10, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

What're the odds...sorry, I haven't seen you around NPP before...I still should've been a bit more polite about it. In any case, keep up the good work! I've watchlisted the article, so if it is removed, I'll just AfD it. Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:14, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

It's common courtesy to warn users before vanishing. tsk tsk :P Yeah, I remember the name, but it's not every day you see who tagged the article (except when you need to notify them about warnings, which I did today!). Dihydrogen Monoxide 07:18, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Green Arrow's rogues gallery

Virtually every other noteworthy DC Comics hero has an article about their frequent enemies, so why not Green Arrow!? I don't understand your problem with the reference links reverting back to the Green Arrow article itself. That's better than having no substance at all. TMC1982 1:05 a.m., 9 September 2007 (UTC)

So why is this particular one called "rogues gallery" then? If you really insist on keeping it, at least make it consistent with the other lists of enemies. GlassCobra (talk • contribs) 08:07, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

I just moved the article so that it can be titled List of Green Arrow enemies (so that it would be more consistent with the other lists). I beat you to the punch! TMC1982 1:13 a.m., 9 September 2007 (UTC)

The Novels WikiProject Newsletter: Issue XVI - September 2007

The September 2007 issue of the Novels WikiProject newsletter has been published. You may read the newsletter, change the format in which future issues will be delivered to you, or unsubscribe from this notification by following the link. Thank you.

This is an automated delivery by grafikbot 09:29, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Legal Complaint?

WE ARE MAKING A LEGAL COMPLAINT ABOUT THE CONSISTENT REVERTING OF OUR EDITS - WOMACK & WOMACK/ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY CECIL WOMACK /ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS FORMERLY LINDA WOMACK

THIS COMMENT IS PERSONALLY FROM ZEKKARIYAS/CECIL WOMACK & ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS/LINDA WOMACK

WE ARE POLITELY REFERRING THE CONTENT OF THE ARTICLES ON YOUR SITE, WITH MATERIALS THAT ARE NOT TRUE, REGARDING OUR BIO, CURRENT AND PAST. WE THEREFORE, ARRANGED TO HAVE THOSE EDITED. SO THAT THEY WOULD REFLECT A TRUE REPRESENTATION OF OURSELVES WITHIN YOUR SITE. WE WERE TOLD THAT THIS WAS AN EDITABLE SITE, ALSO THAT IT DOESN'T INFRINGE UPON COPYRIGHT, AND CERTAINLY NOT UPON A PERSONS PERSONAL COPYRIGHT, THE RIGHT TO HAVE INFORMATION ABOUT THEMSELVES PUBLICALLY DISPLAYED.

WE ARE NOT HAPPY WITH THE CONTENT AT PRESENT, THAT KEEPS REPLACING THE EDITS OUR ACCOUNT HAS MADE.

WE THEREFORE, REQUEST THAT YOU REVERT TO THE EDITS FROM OUR ACCOUNTS, ASAP.

WE APPRECIATE YOUR COMPLIANCE TO OUR REQUEST.

ZEKKARIYAS & ZERIIYA ZEKKARIYAS —Preceding unsigned comment added by Zekka (talk • contribs)

I stuck a template on this one's page letting them know that legal threats aren't acceptable. How bizarre...and hilarious. I'm still trying to understand the "connect" and "double-connect" thing. - Smashville 04:45, 10 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

Thanks. You don't have to worry about a legal threat from someone who don't understand how to use caps-lock. :-) — Indon (reply) — 18:52, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Hey Ya Article.

No questions really. I just did not wish that type of hate to be present. It would be nice if Wiki offered a way to flag for hate type things. I would have much rather tagged it for a fix than done it myself (As you noted I do not know all the rules.) Anyway, thank you for fixing my fix. Kep up the good work.

-Jeebee25 —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jeebee25 (talk • contribs) 20:51, 9 September 2007 (UTC)

Signpost updated for September 10th, 2007.

Weekly Delivery

You are receiving this message because you have signed up for the Signpost spamlist. If you wish to stop receiving these messages, simply remove your name from the list. R Delivery Bot 20:20, 11 September 2007 (UTC)

schools and wiki

yes, they are not going about it the right way. But they need guidance, not rejection. I've been looking at such projects, and the way the coordination is handled is on a subpage of WP:SUP & by use of the article talk page. It is considered quite acceptable to explain there that it is a school project, and the rules. Here's an example: [2] and [3] and even a template {{Educational assignment}} .

I was in the process of writing some advice to the teacher. I just know of these things & am not an expert, and I was going to refer the teacher to people who could help more. DGG (talk) 00:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

and see Wikipedia:School_and_university_projects_-_instructions_for_teachers_and_lecturers. This has all been worked out for them.

This particular page of course is wrong, and will be deleted once communication is established. DGG (talk) 01:15, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

AFD Noel Gray

Thanks for your contribution. On the matter of "invention" the article Artificial pacemaker clarifies. Best QRS 01:36, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Wolfgang Ullmann

Hello GlassCobra! I am expanding the biography of Wolfgang Ullmann. Please don't do anything to the article. RS1900 02:48, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Ok! RS1900 02:51, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Counter-Vandalism

No problem. Something about the repetitive whack-a-mole nature is relaxing, so I usually do it wind-down in the evenings :) Best, --Bfigura ^(talk) 03:45, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

As much as I adore the new version of twinkle, I might have to leave you to it. Gotta get some rest. Enjoy :) --Bfigura ^(talk) 05:47, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Perimeter Records

Hello Glass Cobra,
You proposed to delete my article on Perimeter Records and the action was swiftly carried out by C.Fred.
I will rewrite the article with substantial notability and would appreciate any further comments/suggestions.
Thank you. Rocktheknobs 04:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

If I may ask your advice. How can I list Perimeter Records within the article Independent Record Labels?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_record_labels Rocktheknobs 05:20, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Barnstar

		The RickK Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		For your obvious vandal-fighting capabilities, which you are using quite well! :) Jmlk17 08:57, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Hee hee hee

Yep you did beat me, but I went ahead and added back in the info he was trying to add, closing the table, and did some other cleanup tasks, like moving "see also" before reflist, etc. Thanks for being there! ^Ariel♥Gold 10:56, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

USA v. Barhoumi

is not a {{copyvio}}. The bot made a mistake. See the talk page. Geo Swan 17:41, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

chris horwood

Sorry i was just trying to raise awareness. delete it now please —Preceding unsigned comment added by JonesA-123 (talk • contribs)

Point of interest spammer

Persistent little bugger, ain't it? --Orange Mike 19:40, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

I think this is at least the third or fourth registered username they've had, in additional to a couple of IPs. I first noticed them when they demanded (on the Wikipedia Help page) assistance to stop the "vandals" who were removing their spamlinks and punishment of said "vandals"! --Orange Mike 19:46, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

EV Nova UBX

Indeed, situations like this can be tricky aesthetically. I added "EV" in the left section of the userbox, which hopefully looks better. Thanks for being vigilant about fair use! Scepia 23:17, 12 September 2007 (UTC)

Genki Rockets question

Hi GlassCobra, I added another source to Genki Rockets, titled Automatic Love. Is this the sort of source that is more appropriate for a Wikipedia article? Kat, Queen of Typos 02:12, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Seaford Linton III

Excuse me glasscobra im not sure why seaford linton was removed by you, or im not sure why it was marked for speedy deletion can you please tell me why cant an article or biography of seaford linton be put up..do you guys do this to all new biographs? please let me know..

Silentspoken 05:51, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

THE NEED

THE NEED - Rock/Pop/Alternative Band. Members: Garrett McArthur, Danny Mareco, TJ Hartmann, Jonathan Beveridge

The Need is an alternative pop rock band signed with Universal Music Group through DelFi Music Group. The "queer-core band" that is referred is not correct. There were several corrections that were made, then revoked. this is not fair. We have a copyright on the name and are a current band going to be feature on the hit television show "Grey's Anatomy." Please unblock and let edit! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 72.129.69.164 (talk) 09:43, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

The Need

I always interpreted the 3 revert rule to mean that someone is reverting exactly the same, or substantially the same content back and forth. I had no idea that reverting in a clearly discernible series of baby steps that constituted one big revert would bee seen as a violation, technically or otherwise, as there was no back and forth interplay. But anyhow, I figured out how to install and use Twinkle, so I won't be fumbling around trying to figure out how to get back to the non-vandalized version of a page anymore! Thanks for the heads up.OfficeGirl 12:39, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

YRBS

I saw that someone tagged the YRBS article for speedy deletion, and I do not understand. The YRBS is the only repeated federal study of adolescent risk behavior, and there is only one other repeated study of adolescent risk behavior (conducted by U Michigan). EVERY piece of information that we have about trends over time in smoking, drinking, sex, etc., which is reported in the media uses either YRBS or Monitoring the Future (the Michigan study). The YRBS is featured in hundreds of media reports every year. If you have doubts on notability call up any national, state, or local department of public health and ask where they get their information from, and look in Congressional hearings and briefings for policy makers. They all use YRBS. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jerosenb (talk • contribs) 14:27, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Offline

Your StatusBot says that you were offline since August 28, 2007. Does your StatusBot work? Anyways, thank you for responding to my question yesterday. --Mayfare 20:35, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Well...

This ;) Give me 15 mins, and it'll be ready to go - in case you like it! ;) Love, Phaedriel - 21:11, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

So happy you liked it! :)

I'm so happy you liked it, my friend! :) I'm truly sorry about the delay, but I swear, I simply wasn't in my best wikimood lately... but hey, I hope it was worth the wait ;) Let me know if you need my help with anything else, will you? Love, Phaedriel - 22:33, 13 September 2007 (UTC)

Re : Talk page image

I'm perfectly okay with it. :) - Cheers, Mailer Diablo 02:04, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

Hopeful Network

Hello - I am trying to get through the speedy deletion for the Hopeful Network but must admit I am new to posting on Wikipedia. I'm finding it a bit confusing and not user-friendly to figure out what I need to do. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Steverding (talk • contribs) 06:32, 15 September 2007 (UTC)

The Artist Formerly Known as Scrotom

Why are you the biggest bitch on the internet? The Artist Formerly Known as Scrotom fully deserves recognition as one of the 100 Worst Britons of all time- his fame has been suppressed for too long!! May you burn in hell, alone, while Vincent Arthur Johannesburg sits safely behind the pearly gates of Wikipedia Heaven where you, my dear friend, have banished him for eternity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Theartistformerlyknownasscrotom (talk • contribs)

STvsSW

Its a redirect to another page that is more or less trying to recreate a deleted page. The page got deleted, I've learned to deal with it. So should others. Try and recreate it at some point in the future, but not weeks after it was just deleted. Alyeska 06:03, 16 September 2007 (UTC)

Yeh, confused

Sorry, can't figure out how to properly link the pages for proposed deletions of Nathan MacDonald and Yugo Deb Net, nor Erik Eastaugh (with his old page around). I have made quite a mess, and don't know how to fix it, and am going to sleep soon. If you can work it out, I'd be much obliged. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jembot99 (talk • contribs) 15:39, 16 September 2007 (UTC)