Talk:GlassFish
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Untitled discussion
The acronym FCS should be explained.
Really annoying advertising.
And there is another page on it, too, merge? --Rayc 00:52, 19 July 2006 (UTC)
- Merge sounds good. Mathiastck 22:00, 5 September 2006 (UTC)
This page reads more like GlassFish marketing material than an encyclopedia article.
I'd like to see the articles merged, however I don't want to see the advertising merged. Comparisons would be fine, but this is just hype. Pyroman 14:10, 18 September 2006 (UTC)
Merging sounds good to me. Having two pages is confusing. --Micah hainline 14:27, 23 October 2006 (UTC)
Could you point out the portions that sound like an advert/hype? --Shreeg 21:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- The "highlights" and "demos" sections read like advertisement. Lists of highlights, demos, or selling points are not encyclopedic. The intro paragraph seems much more neutral. --Ginkgo100 talk ยท e@ 21:36, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
- I was selecting a Application Server and the stuff declared as "advert/hype" is simply true, helped me to do the selection, please move it back in. 85.115.15.50 12:43, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
- I also do not understand some changes of 24.7.112.64 85.115.15.50 12:52, 3 January 2007 (UTC)
I have cleaned out much of the content to be in line with the Wikipedia's intent. Please let me know if anything else needs to be addressed at shreed AT sun DOT com
--Shreeg 22:00, 19 November 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Productizing
Wow, Productizing is not a real word, so not a word I can't even guess what it's supposed to mean. 83.70.28.138 11:57, 28 April 2007 (UTC)
It's every bit as much a word as any other verbed noun. Verbing is a fine tradition streching back to the birth of modern english. It's meaning should be clear to any native speaker of the language, "to make into a product", just as the word verbing itself means "to make into a verb". Netdance 17:00, 4 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GlassFish logo.gif
Image:GlassFish logo.gif is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.BetacommandBot 04:28, 5 June 2007 (UTC)