Talk:Glam punk
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
Glam punk is within the scope of WikiProject Music genres, a user driven attempt to clean up and standardise music genre articles on Wikipedia. Please visit the project guidelines page for ideas on how to structure a genre article and help us assess and improve genre articles to good and 1.0 standards. | |
| Stub | This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the assessment scale. | |
 |
This article is part of WikiProject Punk music, an attempt to improve articles related to Punk rock. Please participate by visiting the project page for more details on the projects. |
[edit] Stop deleting sourced info
Just because YOU do not like an article doesn't mean that you can delete it. ESPECIALLY when it is a sourced article.Crescentia 14:11, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
If you actually read the talk page edit history you would see the only sources that were deleted were because they had nothing to do with what was in the article. Hoponpop69 23:14, 17 September 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Sources are getting deleted for valid reasons
Hoponpop69 00:18, 1 October 2007 (UTC)
- [4] —Preceding unsigned comment added by Hoponpop69 (talk • contribs) 01:46, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- [5]Hoponpop69 01:57, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
- [6]Hoponpop69 02:00, 4 October 2007 (UTC)
-
- The numerous sources (17) are in following with WP:Verifiability, tough luck if you "don't like them". Troll this article again, vandalising huge sections and a move will be made to get you banned for WP:VANDAL, WP:BLANK, WP:TROLL. If you feel certain parts need an aditional source or a source at all, then a "fact" tag is to be placed next to it, however your blanking/vandalism of the article will be reverted. You could always go listen to your Green Day CDs while the big boys contrib to the articles. - TheOnly ones (talk) 14:41, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
How about actually taking a look at those sources, you'd realise most of them don't even mention the term glam punk. Irregardless I reverted back to your edit (with some small edits like deleting a source that was a geocities site) because I don't have time for this, and you will soon be blocked for incivility after I file a report.Hoponpop69 (talk) 22:38, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Glampunk.org has been deemed an invalid source
[7] Hoponpop69 00:29, 13 November 2007 (UTC)
