User talk:Giuliosavo
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
[edit] Speedy deletion of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC
A tag has been placed on Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travistalk 20:52, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] December 2007
Please do not remove speedy deletion notices from pages you have created yourself, as you did with Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC. Please use the {{hangon}} template on the page instead if you disagree with the deletion. Thank you. —Travistalk 21:00, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Frederick J. Iseman
A tag has been placed on Frederick J. Iseman requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. —Travistalk 21:01, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC
A tag has been placed on Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. KingNewbs (talk) 21:28, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.caxton-iseman.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:37, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
A tag has been placed on Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done for the following reason:
Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not meet basic Wikipedia criteria may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as an appropriate article, and if you can indicate why the subject of this article is appropriate, you may contest the tagging. To do this, add {{hangon}} on the top of the page and leave a note on the article's talk page explaining your position. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would confirm its subject's notability under the guidelines.
For guidelines on specific types of articles, you may want to check out our criteria for biographies, for web sites, for bands, or for companies. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. Dawn bard (talk) 19:41, 20 December 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.caxton-iseman.com. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 19:27, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Caxton-Iseman Capital, LLC
Please do not continue to recreate this article. It has now been deleted four times by three different admins. This should indicate that the article as it stands is not acceptable to Wikipedia. Please contact me if you have any queries. --John (talk) 19:36, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Speedy deletion of Frederick J. Iseman
A tag has been placed on Frederick J. Iseman, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be blatant advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read our the guidelines on spam as well as the Wikipedia:Business' FAQ for more information.
If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Mr Senseless (talk) 15:13, 8 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Frederick Iseman
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick Iseman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.belfercenter.org/experts/1330/frederick_iseman.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 21:13, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
- Hello, I have replied to your post at Talk:Frederick Iseman. I will summarize my post here: The main problem with the article is that it appears to be a copy of copyrighted material available on the web. I give an explanation about what to do about that. The second problem is the question of advertising. The best way to handle that is by citing third-party sources that support that this person/company is notable. The third question is one of formatting. That is the easiest to fix and it is also the point of least concern. Please let me know if I can help further. Thanks, Johntex\talk 21:47, 9 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Frederick Iseman
This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Frederick Iseman, and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.belfercenter.org/experts/1330/frederick_iseman.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.
This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot (talk) 15:45, 15 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] February 2008
Hi, the recent edit you made to Fredrick J. Iseman has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thanks. Keilana|Parlez ici 19:25, 15 February 2008 (UTC)
The recent edit you made to Frederick Iseman constitutes vandalism, and has been reverted. Please do not continue to vandalize pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thanks. · AndonicO Hail! 19:29, 15 February 2008 (UTC))
[edit] Fredrick J. Iseman
Hi Giuliosavo. You blanked the page Fredrick J. Iseman, and that was rightly reverted. I guess that the reason was that it is misspelled, so I advise You to use the speedy template {{Db-author}} on the page, for a quicker response. Maybe like this: {{Db-author|rationale=Optional reason will be displayed in red}} – Leo Laursen – ☏ ⌘ 15:02, 18 February 2008 (UTC)
