Talk:Gilda Radner
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
| This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects: | |||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
The original article on Gilda Radner wasn't very accurate. Two major things that weren't were the fact that Gilda Radner wrote her book, "It's Always Something", after she found out that her cancer really hadn't subsided, and she didn't die in her sleep. Well, sort of. See, she died while she was going to have another operation to help her cancer, and she just didn't wake up from it. Her husband was with her when they found that she wouldn't wake up, but it wasn't like she died while in her home sleeping.
- Well, according to her husband in his own writings, she "died in her sleep," which is a much more dignified explaination than "she died on the operating table." If that's the way her husband wanted the facts to be expressed, then that should be honored. -EB-
- Extremely dubious proposition, indeed, indefensible. What happened? Where did she die? This is an encyclopedia, not a memorial album. Ortolan88
Removed from article:
- Gilda Radner is remembered as a legendary performer with a kind heart who battled extreme circumstances with a smile and open arms for everyone around her.
It is clear from the article that she was courageous, funny, and kind, so this POV paragraph isn't needed. Ortolan88 04:04 Nov 3, 2002 (UTC)
(In accordance to the response made by Ortolan88) Well, fine, but the original article made it seem like she was at home or something. It would have been fine to say, "She went in for an operation, and during the operation she died in her sleep"(in fact, that would have been the perfect thing to say) the original article leave the operation part out, and so therefore it makes it seem like, "oh, one day she was at home and was sleeping and died, just out of the blue," ..and her husband expresses in his original article to the press that she had gone in for an operation and died in her sleep, so I think he would have wanted that part there, too.
Any true fan would have wanted that in there, AND since there is a place to submit any corrections, I thought it was the good thing to do. I don't know many things about this site, but if there is a place for people to correct information, I think I should have my rights to do so. Also, encyclopedia's are supposed to enclose information about the person that is important, and her ending is an important thing for people to know, so it should be accurate. Plus to be honest, if I had died during an operation, I wouldn't want people to remember it as me just randomly dying in my sleep oneday. Would you want it that way?(December 14, 2002 -- 1:15 PM - EST. Prettypatchie@aol.com
- The whole Wikipedia is based on correcting misinformation and keeping a neutral point of view. You have come to the right place and you are doing the right thing by raising these questions. However, dying anesthetized on an operating table is not dying in your sleep. Did she die during an operation? Did she die in a hospital? Did she die while sleeping normally in a hospital preparing for an operation? That is what we need to know to make an encyclopedia article. What a"true fan would have wanted" is irrelevant. What happened is relevant. Where and how did Gilda Radner die?Ortolan88 23:22 Dec 16, 2002 (UTC)
Does anyone perhaps know if Gilda had a middle name?
- Yes - page updated (Google: "gilda susan" radner for several references) Dl2000 03:00, 2 October 2006 (UTC)
She didn't die while on the operating table - she wasn't even going in for an operation. She was getting a CAT scan and they put her under for it and she flipped out but they did it anyway and she never woke up.
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GildaRadner.jpg
Image:GildaRadner.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 22:37, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
