Talk:Gilbert-Varshamov bound

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

k seems to be already bound in the second inequality and therefore "where k is the greatest integer for which..." is nonsense.

in the case of prime k, isn't the numerator should be q^(n-1)? —Preceding unsigned comment added by 132.69.139.230 (talk) 11:14, 5 November 2007 (UTC)