Talk:Giant Enemy Crab
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Internet culture, an attempt to better organise information in articles related to the Internet culture. For more information, visit the project page. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | |
| ??? | This article has not yet received an importance rating on the importance scale. | |
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Video games. For more information, visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. | |
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-Class on the assessment scale. | |
| Low | This article is on a subject of Low priority within gaming for inclusion in Wikipedia 1.0. | |
|
VG To-do:
|
||
Contents |
[edit] Article
This meme is getting pretty notable now being referenced at final version of MotorStorm. I think a separated article is really needed now. --Ciao 90 21:22, 6 March 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Picture
Okay, is that seriously the best picture that we could find? There's nothing larger out there? 71.202.217.229 02:05, 15 March 2007 (UTC)
That's the first thing i found, and was really hungry at the time. i ment to find a better one later, but i was REALLY hungry and a bit confused. thats what i came out with. yes, lets enlarge it a little...--Randoman412 18:38, 21 April 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Elite beat agents reference
That bit with the Elite beat agents supposedly having an intentional reference to massive damage is highly unlikely, as it was made before the conference. It's most likely just a coincidence. —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 207.233.120.2 (talk) 17:31, 2 May 2007 (UTC).
man i hate when humor is described by wikipedia in this encyclopedic tone --AnYoNe! 17:39, 22 May 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pokemon Diamond and Pearl
Don't forget about the reference in Pokemon Diamond Pearl- see [1] (Pause at 1:11)
- Not every instance of the phrase "massive damage" is a reference to this! 76.200.100.206 21:20, 12 October 2007 (UTC)
- I'd have to agree. Reading through the article, I got the feeling that a lot of items in the list were questionable. The mere use of the phrase "massive damage" isn't necessarily a reference to the PS3 crab. Because really, are the words "massive damage" really THAT unusual? --169.233.5.115 (talk) 22:04, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Pokemon Battle Revolution
Someone said they said it in Pokemon Battle Revolution, though they said "might" based on what they think could appear in the game, oh how he/she was right. http://pokemon-games.com/pokemonbattlerev/ Hilight Reel - Mime Jr. - Watch Video - MASSIVE DAMAGE! Added back up.
[edit] Better demonstration of the origin
I think this youtube movie is better: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2g1fr5vk72M or search for "Giant Enemy Crab! Massive Damage mix"... shows the whole thing with only one cut.
[edit] Nominate this for deletion
Since this article obviously isn;t intellagent at all I nominate it for deletion —Preceding unsigned comment added by 76.185.24.4 (talk) 01:06, 20 September 2007 (UTC)
- There are few things more valuable on Wikipedia than valid articles on ridiculous, but true, things. That's an edge that conventional encyclopedias cannot match because of either size or manpower constraints. Neither should we delete content on the basis that its subject is unusual - as opposed to the content's merit - or distasteful - as we have one of the largest userbases anywhere on the Net, and if we allow being unpleasant to someone as a deletion reason we can save everyone some time by blowing up the encyclopedia and going home. Also note, he said, typing to any onlookers since the previous message was left in September, that it's usually more fair and certainly more polite to work with involved editors or experts of the field first before nominating for deletion - and politeness is no small thing in an environment such as this. For one thing, less extreme measures are often called for; for another, an article often does not contain all relevant information regarding its worth; for yet another, deletion nomination has too many problems on its own to be used lightly, which is to say that I just recently saw six people vote speedy delete in an AfD where the second line of the nomination established why this wasn't applicable.
Anyway. I'd be against this article if the subject was just an internet meme, but it appears to have integrated itself into the commercial, multi-billion-dollar industry at a ridiculous pace and is on a whole other level than fandom jokes. --Kizor 22:16, 22 January 2008 (UTC)
[edit] Fair use rationale for Image:GiantEnemyCrab.jpg
Image:GiantEnemyCrab.jpg is being used on this article. I notice the image page specifies that the image is being used under fair use but there is no explanation or rationale as to why its use in this Wikipedia article constitutes fair use. In addition to the boilerplate fair use template, you must also write out on the image description page a specific explanation or rationale for why using this image in each article is consistent with fair use.
Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. Using one of the templates at Wikipedia:Fair use rationale guideline is an easy way to insure that your image is in compliance with Wikipedia policy, but remember that you must complete the template. Do not simply insert a blank template on an image page.
If there is other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified the fair use rationale on the other images used on this page. Note that any fair use images uploaded after 4 May, 2006, and lacking such an explanation will be deleted one week after they have been uploaded, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you.
BetacommandBot 21:51, 6 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] Spiderman: Friend or Foe?
I was watching a video review of this SPiderman game, and at one point, they showed a brief gameplay clip halfway through the review and you can clearly see the words, "MASSIVE DAMAGE" at the top of the screen.
http://www.gametrailers.com/player/27296.html 71.185.239.206 (talk) 03:19, 19 November 2007 (UTC)
[edit] No such game
There's no game named "Viva Pinata". Changed it to Viva Piñata.194.237.146.98 (talk) 14:55, 29 November 2007 (UTC)
