Talk:Getrag/Archive 1

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.

Contents

Capitalization?

Someone edited GETRAG to read Getrag. GETRAG is an acronym, thus Getrag is incorrect. I have changed it back.

See the company's homepage: http://www.getrag.de/51 GETRAG is an acronym for Getriebe- und Zahnradfabrik Hermann Hagenmeyer AG

-Series8217

  • I tend to agree. While WP:MOSTM indicates that all caps should be avoided even when a trademark holder encourages its capitalization, I believe acronyms fall into a different category (which is not discussed in that guideline). Pages that indicate the convention which would require a capitalized GETRAG are 3M (Minnesota Mining and Manufacturing), BMW, GM, etc... Because GETRAG is an acronym just as are the aforementioned trademarks, it too should be capitalized. I'll change this back, and if someone else disagrees, we can discuss it on this page. Nicholas SL Smith 00:59, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
  • Also, I thought it important to mention that this does not appear to be an acronym to English speakers; in German is is very much an acronym (think GETRiebe-...AG). Nicholas SL Smith 01:08, 9 November 2007 (UTC)
    • Please see Manual of Style (trademarks)discussion regarding issues such as GETRAG and SAAB, which are capitalized registered acronym trademarks, but are not strict acronyms. A discussion is taking place there on this topic to resolve differences of opinion. Nicholas SL Smith (talk) 02:54, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
      • I think that some of the "rules" are not appropriate. For example, the article about Byte (magazine) looks strange because the name of this publication is always written BYTE. It seems a similar situation is with this case where the name GETRAG is typically written all in caps. — CZmarlin (talk) 06:04, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
Comments added at Manual of Style (trademarks) discussion, but basically I don't see anything wrong with Byte (or Time). They're words, for which the rules of the English language say do not capitalize. So why indulge these attempts at corporate promotion? And as mentioned elsewhere, Getrag is not "typically" written all in caps by reliable sources. If the NYT, BBC et al can write Getrag (or Saab), so can we. --DeLarge (talk) 10:10, 20 November 2007 (UTC)
The manual of style appears to be pretty definitive on the subject of names such as Time or Byte, which are simple words. I do like to see information in Wikipedia with as little interpretation by editors as possible (modification for the purposes of fitting information into a form we deem acceptable for presentation). I think we ought to present what is out there, such as TIME or BYTE - that is a conversation for Wikipedia talk:Manual of Style (trademarks). Here - once we come up with a rule to address partial acronyms such as GETRAG, we can apply it to this and other article names. Nicholas SL Smith (talk) 18:26, 20 November 2007 (UTC)


Requested move discussion

It is pretty clear that the consensus is to leave the article at GETRAG at present. I suggest cleaning up the duplicated categories. Neil  11:44, 10 December 2007 (UTC)

The "Getrag" transmission category has been cleaned up - working to clean up other issues. Nicholas SL Smithchatter 02:21, 11 December 2007 (UTC)
I think I've cleaned up all Getrag/GETRAG issues -- Nicholas SL Smithchatter 02:52, 25 January 2008 (UTC)
Archive This is an archive of past discussions. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page.