Talk:Gesta Hunnorum et Hungarorum

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Calling it "imaginative" has the airs of a sarcastic insult. It would be more worthwhile to actually point out what portions are popularly considered incorrect.

Simon Kezai, to my knowledge, believed statements made in his writings to be common knowledge. And let's not forget that Western chroniclers of the time were of the opinion that Huns and Hungarians were the descendants of demons.

--69.158.22.6 21:54, 24 December 2005 (UTC)

You should cite sources for your statements. Calling a historical chronicle a "fictional legend collection" (sic! sic!! sic!!!) is an awfully dilletant move. Don't neglect stupidity, wipe it out, as I did! - John

Ps:You sould aware of Juro's writings, I've found it several times misleading and dilettant. You should regularly check him. I don't have time for that. xx

Yes, I can confirm that. But above all, I find the edits of a certain Vince B, Zello and Ale(n?)sha very misleading and dilletant. Actually they are all wrong to the extent that all content regarding Hungarian history in the English wikipedia is just plainly wrong. But I have no time for that. yy