Talk:Geosynthetic
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject:Civil Engineering, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of civil engineering. For more information, or to get involved, visit the project page. |
| B | This article has been rated as B-Class. |
 |
Geosynthetic was a good article nominee, but did not meet the good article criteria at the time. There are suggestions below for improving the article. Once these are addressed, the article can be renominated. Editors may also seek a reassessment of the decision if they believe there was a mistake. Reviewed version: June 14, 2006 |
[edit] Rewritten
I have rewritten and extended the article. Although it is by no means finished it has a backbone of a good article hopefully. Further edits, extensions and comments will be welcommed. Grahams Child 20:29, 1 June 2006 (UTC)
[edit] Good Article nomination has failed
The Good article nomination for Geosynthetic has failed, for the following reason(s):
- I don't think this yet qualifies as well written - each paragraph seems more like a short definition than encyclopaedic prose. The bullet pointed list under disadvantages should be converted to prose. And section headings need to follow the capitalisation described in the WP:MOS. Finally, a standard width should be used for images for aesthetic reasons. Alternating left and right alignment also usually looks better. Worldtraveller 11:53, 14 June 2006 (UTC)
