Talk:Georgie Thompson

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article must adhere to the policy on biographies of living persons. Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous. If such material is repeatedly inserted or if there are other concerns relative to this policy, report it on the living persons biographies noticeboard.

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

This article was nominated for deletion in the past. The result of the discussion was keep.

Who keeps reverting to the sentence 'and only ever presents Afternoon Report'? Not only is that phraseology completely un-encyclopaedic, the second she, god forbid, had a schedule change, it would render the sentence completely false. —Preceding unsigned comment added by Carrliadiere (talk • contribs) 16:47, 15 October 2007 (UTC)

--St.jamesrc 17:19, 30 January 2007 (UTC)Harry Hill

I think really that there should be some sort of mention for the Harry Hill incident. For "bladeofgrass" to keep vandalising the page just because he/she didn't like it, isn't really acceptable.

• No, I don't remove it because I don't like it, I remove it because you have never provided a reliable source that it was said, breaking one of the funamental rules of wikipedia.Bladeofgrass 11:13, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

In which case, you may as well remove virtually every page on Wikipedia that doesn't reference every single source. The Harry Hill incident is one piece of information that should be provided.

• No, on pages which are not biographies of living persons, uncited facts should be either marked as requiring a citation, or the information removed. For living people though, this information should be removedb immediately. Please read basic wikipedia policy on attribution. Bladeofgrass 17:54, 25 February 2007 (UTC)

[edit] Reference query

The first reference in article, used in 2 places, appears not to mention either of the facts which it is quoted as supporting. May-be the page has changed since it was quoted but the reference fails to give any access details. A replacement reference needs to be attached for these facts. Keith D 18:30, 8 November 2007 (UTC)