Talk:Georgia Institute of Technology Historic District

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state) (Rated Start-Class) Georgia (U.S. state) Portal This article is part of WikiProject Georgia (U.S. state), an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Georgia (U.S. state) on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. Start This article has been rated as Start-Class on the quality scale. Mid This article has been rated as Mid-importance on the importance scale. WikiProject Atlanta (Rated B-Class) Georgia Institute of Technology Historic District is within the scope of WikiProject Atlanta, dedicated to improving Wikipedia's coverage of Metro Atlanta. For more information see the project page. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale. National Register of Historic Places WikiProject (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of the National Register of Historic Places WikiProject, a collaborative effort to improve Wikipedia's coverage of listings on the U.S. National Register of Historic Places. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the assessment scale. WikiProject Georgia Tech (Rated B-Class) This article is within the scope of WikiProject Georgia Tech. If you would like to help, you can edit this article or visit the project page, where you can join the project and/or contribute to the discussion. B This article has been rated as B-Class on the quality scale.

To-do list for Georgia Institute of Technology Historic District:	edit · history · watch · refresh
Here are some tasks you can do:

[edit] Copyright note

Note that much of the text of this article is copied verbatim from the National Park Service website. My understanding is that the National Park Service is a federal agency in the United States, and therefore its works are not copyrighted. MaxVeers 21:00, 11 January 2007 (UTC)

However, it should be either rewritten to conform to our manual of style, and/or acknowledged. It isn't any less plaigiaristic because the text isn't copyrighted. Daniel Case (talk) 18:51, 16 February 2008 (UTC)