Talk:George Wunder

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

	This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.	Biography Portal
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
	This article is supported by the Arts and Entertainment work group.

This article has been automatically assessed as Stub-Class by WikiProject Biography because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the class parameter of the {{WPBiography}} template, removing {{WPBiography}}'s auto=yes parameter from this talk page, and removing the stub template from the article.

	comics Portal This article is in the scope of WikiProject Comics, a collaborative effort to build an encyclopedic guide to comics on Wikipedia. Get involved! Help with current tasks, visit the notice board, edit the attached article or discuss it at the project talk page.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale. Please explain the rating here.
???	This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.
More information: This article has been automatically rated as Stub-Class because it uses a stub template. If you agree with the assessment, please remove |auto=yes from this template. If you disagree with the assessment, please change it by editing the |class= parameter in this template and removing the stub template from the article. This article has been checked against the following criteria for B-Class status: Referencing and citation: not checked Coverage and accuracy: not checked Structure: not checked Grammar: not checked Supporting materials: not checked To fill out this checklist, please add the following to the template call: <!-- 1. It is suitably referenced, and all major points are appropriately cited. --> |B-Class-1=yes/no <!-- 2. It reasonably covers the topic, and does not contain major omissions or inaccuracies. --> |B-Class-2=yes/no <!-- 3. It has a defined structure, including a lead section and one or more sections of content. --> |B-Class-3=yes/no <!-- 4. It is free from major grammatical errors. --> |B-Class-4=yes/no <!-- 5. It contains appropriate supporting materials, such as an infobox, images, or diagrams. --> |B-Class-5=yes/no Related work groups (general): Comics creators work group

Maurice Horn didn't like George Wunder. Writing in the 1960s, he chose the two panels I mentioned from the late 1950s, to prove he couldn't draw. In chapter 5 of Couperie et.al., 'The Crisis of the Forties, which he wrote, Horn says: "...many of these artists now abandoned the strips they had created, which thereupon fell into the hands of undeserving hacks. The most heartbreaking example is the case of George Wunder, who took over "Terry" on Caniff's departure in 1947; with passionate obstinacy, he seemed to delight in turning the strip into a hideous antithesis of the "Terry" of the golden age. Unfortunately, he succeeded only too well: the drawings are unsatisfactory; the perspective is wrong; the characters with their equine physiognomies have the stiffness and behavior of robots; the dialogues are drab and humorless, and the scripts are of a characteristic triviality." (p.93) (All punctuation is from the 1968 Crown Publishers translation by Eileen V. Hennessy. Don't blame me.) Reitberger and Fuchs are more kind, but chose Vietnam-era panels and discussed him mainly in terms of his politics. Stephen Becker's Comic Art in America which I cite in my Harold Gray page, is much more positive. He was writing in 1958-59, and discussing much earlier work. In fact he reprints samples from an absolutely wonderful sequence where Terry takes a woman to Siberia to look for her downed airman brother and they are chased across the steppes by Soviet police (naturally). This sequence, lasting from roughly December of 1954 to March of 1955 presents quite a contrast to his later work. Jplatt39 13:26, 24 Dec 2004 (UTC) Revised Jplatt39 06:35, 25 Jan 2005 (UTC)

[edit] WikiProject class rating

This article was automatically assessed because at least one article was rated and this bot brought all the other ratings up to at least that level. BetacommandBot 16:19, 27 August 2007 (UTC)