Talk:George Van Horn Moseley

This article is within the scope of the following WikiProjects:

WikiProject Illinois (Rated Stub-Class)
	This article is part of WikiProject Illinois, an attempt to build a comprehensive and detailed guide to Illinois on Wikipedia. If you would like to participate, you can edit this article, or visit the project page to join the project and/or contribute to the discussion.
Stub	This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.
Low	This article has been rated as Low-importance on the importance scale.

Chicago Portal

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Chicago, which aims to improve all articles related to Chicago.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the quality scale.

???

This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale.

WikiProject Biography (Rated Stub-Class)

This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page.

Biography Portal

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]

This article is supported by the Military work group.

This article is within the scope of the Military history WikiProject. If you would like to participate, please visit the project page, where you can join the project and see lists of open tasks and regional and topical task forces. To use this banner, please see the full instructions.

Stub

This article has been rated as Stub-Class on the quality scale.

Additional information and associated task forces:

Associated task forces (nations and regions):
	United States military history task force

This is the talk page for discussing improvements to the George Van Horn Moseley article.
Please sign and date your posts by typing four tildes (`~~~~`). Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic. New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Ask questions, get answers. This is not a forum for general discussion about the article's subject.	Be polite Assume good faith No personal attacks Be welcoming	Article policies No original research Neutral point of view Verifiability