Talk:George Strickland Kingston
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
 |
This article is within the scope of WikiProject Biography. For more information, visit the project page. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the project's quality scale. [FAQ]
Please rate the article and, if you wish, leave comments here regarding your assessment or the strengths and weaknesses of the article. |
||
 |
George Strickland Kingston is within the scope of WikiProject Australia, which aims to improve Wikipedia's coverage of Australia and Australia-related topics. If you would like to participate, visit the project page. | ||
| Start | This article has been rated as Start-class on the quality scale. | ||
| ??? | This article has not yet received a rating on the importance scale. | ||
|
Assessment comments
|
|||
This article should be at George Kingston. I will move it unless someone can give me a reason not to. Adam 06:17, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- I note that all incoming links are to George Strickland Kingston, and that the title of the book referenced under Further reading also uses "Strickland". I suspect that means the current situation is correct. --Scott Davis Talk 10:13, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
Correct in the sense that that is what he was called in his lifetime, like George Bernard Shaw? Adam 10:46, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
- That's what I meant, yes. But I've listed all the evidence I have to support it. If community censensus is that the current George Kingston should become George Kingston (disambiguation) and George Strickland Kingston should become George Kingston, I'd accept it. --Scott Davis Talk 13:40, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
If you're confident that that is what he was called, OK. Adam 13:54, 30 April 2006 (UTC)
